← Search

Kendall Acheson

Portland, OR
0.0 year-end
25 matches · 13W–12L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Kendall Acheson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
W
N/A
2022-03-13 · MAC-Hasle/Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claude Bosworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2022-02-20 · MAC-Hasle/Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2022-02-04 · MAC-Hasle/Adams · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Raimund Grube
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2022-01-30 · MAC-Hasle/Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy Fields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2021-05-08 · MAC-Hasle/Adams · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlie Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2021-05-01 · MAC-Hasle/Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with MICHAEL DOHERTY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2021-03-27 · MAC-Hasle/Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darren Malinoski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2020-02-08 · MAC-Wright · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2020-01-04 · MAC-Wright · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Lochner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
Karen Walker / Rich Johnson
2019-12-15 · #1 Doubles · with Jeri Finn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2019-12-14 · #1 Doubles · with Sarah Robertson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2019-11-24 · MAC-Mersereau/Handelman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margot Wolfsehr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 46.5% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 84.2% of games
7.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 38.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert