Search

Kendall Acheson

Portland, OR
0.0 year-end
25 matches · 13W–12L · seasons 20192022
Where Kendall sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Kendall is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams8 teams · 2019–2023
N OR-MAC-Adams
2023 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2023
MAC-Hasle/Adams
2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2022
MAC-Hasle/Adams
2021 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2021
MAC-Casebeer
2020 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2020
MAC-Mersereau/Handelman
2020 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2020
MAC-Wright
2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2020
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kendall has been a steady 3.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021, 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 46.5% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 84.2% of games
7.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 38.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history25 matches
W
N/A
2022-03-13 · MAC-Hasle/Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claude Bosworth
+0.063better than expected — took 100% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2022-02-20 · MAC-Hasle/Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Kelly
0.003about as expected — took 35% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Page Watts / Robert Truong
2022-02-04 · MAC-Hasle/Adams · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Raimund Grube
0.003below expectation — took 20% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2022-01-30 · MAC-Hasle/Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy Fields
+0.028better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2021-05-08 · MAC-Hasle/Adams · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlie Adams
+0.034better than expected — took 43% of games against 32% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2021-05-01 · MAC-Hasle/Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with MICHAEL DOHERTY
0.008about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2021-03-27 · MAC-Hasle/Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darren Malinoski
+0.012about as expected — took 29% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Michael Saling / Matt Bolte
2020-02-08 · MAC-Wright · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Thomas
+0.010about as expected — took 50% of games against 47% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2020-01-04 · MAC-Wright · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Lochner
+0.028better than expected — took 56% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
Karen Walker / Rich Johnsonchamps
2019-12-15 · MAC-Wright · #1 Doubles · with Jeri Finn
0.002about as expected — took 38% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2019-12-14 · MAC-Wright · #1 Doubles · with Sarah Robertson
+0.041better than expected — took 56% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2019-11-24 · MAC-Mersereau/Handelman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margot Wolfsehr
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.