Search

Raimund Grube

Portland, OR
0.0 year-end
33 matches · 9W–24L · seasons 20192025
Where Raimund sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Raimund is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams22 teams · 2013–2025
MAC-Kitzis/Eisen
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
2025
MAC-Wehner/Thomas
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
2024
MAC-Thomas/Adsuar
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2024
MAC-Eisen/Kitzis
2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
2023
MAC-Hasle/Adams
2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2022
MAC-Buchholz
2022 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Raimund has been a steady 3.5 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021, 2023, 2024, 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Raimund has gone from the 43rd to the 52nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
36%
9W–16L · 46.6% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 31.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history33 matches
L
2025-03-09 · MAC-Kitzis/Eisen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Sohn
0.022below expectation — took 52% of games against 59% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-02-01 · MAC-Kitzis/Eisen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Curtis
+0.003about as expected — took 56% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-03-02 · MAC-Thomas/Adsuar · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Thomas
0.070below expectation — took 14% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
STEPHEN BRUGH / Steve Snyder
2024-01-07 · MAC-Thomas/Adsuar · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fergus Caldicott
+0.025better than expected — took 59% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 4-3
L
2023-05-20 · MAC-Eisen/Kitzis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Keeney
0.016about as expected — took 55% of games against 59% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2023-04-16 · MAC-Eisen/Kitzis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Meyer
0.041below expectation — took 0% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2022-04-23 · MAC-Hasle/Adams · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Derek Lamprecht
+0.024better than expected — took 38% of games against 32% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
2022-04-17 · MAC-Hasle/Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlie Adams
0.004about as expected — took 62% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
2022-03-13 · MAC-Hasle/Adams · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julian Pscheid
+0.023better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2022-03-05 · MAC-Buchholz · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rico McIver
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2022-02-25 · MAC-Buchholz · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christian Buchholz
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L
Page Watts / Robert Truong
2022-02-04 · MAC-Hasle/Adams · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kendall Acheson
0.003below expectation — took 20% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.