Search

Jessica Dalpiaz

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
36 matches · 18W–18L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.07
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
21%
down to 3.0
79%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 13% down · 87% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.09. Higher than today’s 3.07 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
365 of 399
OR · 3.5
684 of 735

Jessica is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams13 teams · 2017–2027
WHRC-Petersen
2027 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2027
WHRC-Petersen
2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2026
WHRC-Webb
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
WHRC-Webb
2025 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2025
WHRC-Webb
2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2025
WHRC-Potter
2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jessica has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52021202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 63.8% of games
3.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.6% of games
6.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 52.4% of games
7.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 41.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history36 matches
L
2025-11-28 · WHRC-Petersen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Craighill
+0.000better than expected — took 48% of games against 42% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Catalin Stoica / Abigail Taylormixed
2025-11-22 · WHRC-Petersen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Craighill
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-10-11 · WHRC-Petersen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ben Lauritsen
+0.000about as expected — took 46% of games against 49% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
Jeewon Suh / Hsin-Chieh Hsiehmixed
2025-09-07 · WHRC-Petersen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Craighill
+0.000better than expected — took 38% of games against 28% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Ye Gong / Wenyan Limixed
2025-07-25 · WHRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Craighill
+0.000better than expected — took 40% of games against 29% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-07-11 · WHRC-Webb · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Craighill
+0.000about as expected — took 40% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-06-08 · WHRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Chapman
0.042below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Elizabeth Gonyea / Lauren Smith
2025-04-26 · WHRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Chapman
+0.007about as expected — took 56% of games against 53% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Karen Groenweghe / Julie Nguyen
2025-03-29 · WHRC-Webb · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine McMillan
0.019below expectation — took 35% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2024-11-08 · WHRC-Webb · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Craighill
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Kira Kitayama / Todd Carrismixed
2024-10-19 · WHRC-Webb · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Craighill
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Blythe Knott / Jennifer Johnson
2024-05-12 · WHRC-Nakatani · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine McMillan
+0.064better than expected — took 75% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.