← Search

Andrew Muhl

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Baton Rouge, LA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
263 matches · 145W–118L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history263 matches
L
2026-10-26 · Busby/18/3.5/M/BREC · #1 Male Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-19 · Busby/18/3.5/M/BREC · #1 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Crowell
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-12 · Wilbert/18/6.5/M/BREC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stewart Gordon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-12 · Busby/18/3.5/M/BREC · #1 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Eduardo Carreras
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
Xander Vallejo
2026-10-05 · Busby/18/3.5/M/BREC · #2 Male Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-09-29 · Ligh/40/6.5/CM/BREC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chandra Kandula
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-28 · Busby/18/3.5/M/BREC · #1 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Torri
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-15 · Ligh/40/6.5/CM/BREC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chandra Kandula
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-03 · Martin/40/7.5/CM/BREC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Charles Walters
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-27 · Wilbert/18/6.5/M/BREC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tyler Wilson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · Martin/40/7.5/CM/BREC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Umut Meraler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-18 · Ligh/40/6.5/CM/BREC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chandra Kandula
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams80 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
57.1%
16W–12L · 53.3% of games
3.5
50.5%
47W–46L · 50.9% of games
4.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 40.5% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
58.7%
27W–19L · 52.3% of games
7.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 44.7% of games
3.5mixed
56.5%
13W–10L · 51.1% of games
4.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 46.8% of games
6.0mixed
84%
21W–4L · 62.6% of games
7.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 58.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
61 matches
#1 Singles
2%
6 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer