Search

Barbara Boser

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2024
119 matches · 77W–42L · seasons 20192024
Where Barbara sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Barbara is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Barbara has been a steady 3.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020202120222024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Barbara has gone from the 94th to the 73rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
69.4%
59W–26L · 59.1% of games
3.5
50%
15W–15L · 51.8% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history119 matches
L
Kristi Reilly / Judith Watson
2024-10-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Smith
0.021below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-09-17 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sonya Ladd
0.028below expectation — took 59% of games against 67% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2024-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mayela Moneo
0.010below expectation — took 42% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Braganza
+0.016better than expected — took 61% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2024-04-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Kelvington
+0.009better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Maureen Kelly / Irene Trecroci
2024-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Hong Lee
0.011about as expected — took 75% of games against 71% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-04-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Howell
+0.046better than expected — took 100% of games against 67% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Jennifer Olson / Donna Lefeverchamps
2024-04-12 · #3 Doubles · with Jamie Kelvington
0.014about as expected — took 50% of games against 55% expected
2-6, 6-2
W
Kristi Reilly / Carrie Madduxchamps
2024-04-10 · #3 Doubles · with Jamie Kelvington
+0.060better than expected — took 86% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Jeannie Collins / Jennifer Roberts
2024-04-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsea Gray
+0.034better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Jennifer Blais / Kelli Huntsman
2024-03-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mayela Moneo
0.007about as expected — took 46% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
N/A
2024-03-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Pierce
+0.068better than expected — took 100% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.