Search

Jenny Marston

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
37 matches · 11W–26L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.00
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 3 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
52%
down to 3.0
48%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 31% down · 69% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.04. Higher than today’s 3.00 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
388 of 399
OR · 3.5
721 of 735

Jenny is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams15 teams · 2018–2026
IRV-LaBarca/Nolan
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
N OR-IRV-Zawadzki
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
IRV-Knott
2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2025
IRV-LaBarca/Zawadzki
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
Magnificent 5
2024 One Doubles · 3.5 Women
2024
IRV-Towle/LaBarca
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jenny has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520202023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jenny has gone from the 8th to the 43rd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
28.6%
8W–20L · 41.9% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history37 matches
L
2026-05-23 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.013below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-27 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.024below expectation — took 31% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 3-2
L
2026-03-14 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.065below expectation — took 0% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-06-29 · N OR-IRV-Zawadzki · #3 Doubles · with Colleen Walker
+0.002below expectation — took 14% of games against 26% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-05-31 · N OR-IRV-Zawadzki · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsey McGinnis
+0.038better than expected — took 71% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-05-06 · N OR-IRV-Zawadzki · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Matteri
+0.016better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-03-07 · IRV-LaBarca/Zawadzki · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Norling
0.009about as expected — took 43% of games against 48% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-01-04 · IRV-LaBarca/Zawadzki · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Johnson
0.043below expectation — took 40% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-10-04 · IRV-Knott · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Omar Martinez
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2024-09-21 · IRV-Knott · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Harris
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2024-08-09 · Magnificent 5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nichole Anglin
+0.006better than expected — took 100% of games against 81% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-07-27 · Magnificent 5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nichole Anglin
+0.008about as expected — took 50% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.