← Search

Jennifer Bell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Knoxville, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
213 matches · 114W–99L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2019. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history213 matches
W
Default
2026-10-17 · Huffman/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Smead
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-17 · Huffman/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debi English
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-28 · Houck/Knoxville/C40-7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Linda Rankin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-25 · Gingrich/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Fisher
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-09-22 · Gingrich/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lauren Huston
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-17 · Houck/Knoxville/C40-7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendi Arnold
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-01 · Gingrich/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jill Stamper
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-29 · Huffman/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Debi English
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-29 · Gingrich/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Oakley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-24 · Houck/Knoxville/C40-7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendi Arnold
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-22 · Huffman/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debi English
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · Huffman/Knoxville · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams65 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
90.3%
28W–3L · 69.3% of games
4.0
44.4%
40W–50L · 48.9% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 53% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 72.4% of games
7.5
48%
24W–26L · 51.2% of games
8.5
33.3%
7W–14L · 42.2% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
43 matches
#1 Singles
7%
14 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal