← Search

Stacey Ladewski

— year-end
35 matches · 24W–11L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Stacey Ladewski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
L
2021-10-24 · NITA E 35W18c River Trails (Schoyer/Naughton) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2021-10-10 · CDTA E 18&O W/E 3.5W Tam Hanrahan Sun 3 $20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Urbaniak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2021-09-26 · NITA E 35W18c River Trails (Schoyer/Naughton) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gail Wolf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2021-09-19 · NITA E 35W18c River Trails (Schoyer/Naughton) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2021-09-12 · CDTA E 18&O W/E 3.5W Tam Hanrahan Sun 3 $20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Gutowski-Hazzard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2021-08-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Urszula Farry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2021-07-31 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
Jennifer Buss / Julie Steinberg
2021-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Apple Naughton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2021-07-17 · CDTA 18&O W/E 3.5W Tam Hanrahan Tue 7 $20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marell Kowalski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Elizabeth Walker
2021-07-13 · CDTA 18&O W/E 3.5W Tam Hanrahan Tue 7 $20 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2021-06-23 · NITA S 35W18d River Trails (Miller) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gail Wolf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2021-06-17 · NITA S 35W18d River Trails (Miller) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with SoYoung Grote
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Teams7 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 61.4% of games
3.5
71.4%
15W–6L · 54.8% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 51% of the time
#1 Singles
51%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert