← Search

Polly Bonacuse

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fishers, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 23W–34L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history57 matches
L
2025-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Cahill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 5-7
W
2025-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with MacKenzie O'Connor
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-03 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with MacKenzie O'Connor
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-03-27 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carli Houser
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-10-21 · CIN A40 3.5W M CRC Omer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori McKeown
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-10-14 · CIN A40 3.5W M CRC Omer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Farmer
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-09-30 · CIN A40 3.5W M CRC Omer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cecilia Perez Moreno
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2024-08-05 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Kirk (CRC) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Smith
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-07-29 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Kirk (CRC) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Smith
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-07-22 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Kirk (CRC) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Gregor
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-07-08 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Kirk (CRC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Cassetty
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-17 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Kirk (CRC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robbyn Kizer
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 69.9% of games
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 47.2% of games
3.5
34.4%
11W–21L · 43.6% of games
6.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
14 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King