← Search

Jim Sternberg

Newcastle, WA
0.0 year-end
124 matches · 65W–59L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Jim sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Jim is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jim has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Jim has gone from the 89th to the 26th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 47.1% of games
3.5
46.4%
13W–15L · 50.8% of games
6.0
70.8%
17W–7L · 58.1% of games
7.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 42.6% of games
6.0mixed
56.5%
13W–10L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 37.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history124 matches
L
2023-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Gerrans
+0.002about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Michael Myers / John Willingham
2023-04-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Calvin Vu
−0.018below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
David McGrady / Thomas Kawano
2023-02-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Russo Russo
−0.023below expectation — took 45% of games against 57% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2023-02-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Russo Russo
−0.059below expectation — took 20% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2023-02-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Russo Russo
+0.027better than expected — took 55% of games against 43% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2023-01-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lin Chen
−0.023below expectation — took 32% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2023-01-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Sing
+0.006about as expected — took 41% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2022-11-18 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Velibor Peric
−0.027below expectation — took 41% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Jen Pham-Corbett / Andrew Corbettmixed
2022-11-13 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carrie Toppano
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2022-11-11 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Velibor Peric
−0.052below expectation — took 29% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2022-11-05 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Velibor Peric
−0.053below expectation — took 56% of games against 73% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
James Hunter / Patrick Brem
2022-10-30 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Velibor Peric
−0.037below expectation — took 53% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.