Search

Amber Welby

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
171 matches · 101W–70L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.30
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.5
28 of 73
NV · 3.5
94 of 228

Amber is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Amber has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Amber has gone from the 54th to the 75th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.0
87.5%
21W–3L · 71.2% of games
3.5
76.9%
40W–12L · 61.1% of games
4.0
42.6%
29W–39L · 49.5% of games
4.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.5% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history171 matches
L
Megan Bell
2026-05-30 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.027below expectation — took 18% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 3-1
W
2026-05-02 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.009better than expected — took 80% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Amy Nhaisi / Diane Welch
2026-04-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanie Wolfgramm
0.016below expectation — took 41% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Ruth-Ann Edwards / Denise Mandelbaum
2026-04-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Lynch
0.054below expectation — took 20% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Donna Isaacs / Jill Russell
2026-03-23 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacqueline Roberts
0.027below expectation — took 35% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-04-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Lynch
0.049below expectation — took 41% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-01-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacqueline Roberts
0.035below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-01-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Bananto
+0.030better than expected — took 53% of games against 39% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Sonia Vermeys / Valerie Murphy
2024-12-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Back
0.011about as expected — took 65% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2024-12-02 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Bananto
0.018better than expected — took 100% of games against 90% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Samantha Schwartz / Christi Lin
2024-11-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Cerny
0.040below expectation — took 29% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-11-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Cerny
0.000about as expected — took 57% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.