← Search

Candace Bowman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lexington, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
203 matches · 124W–79L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history203 matches
W
2026-10-06 · Yadkin/Kaplan/18+6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chanel Griggs
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-09-29 · Yadkin/Kaplan/18+6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Long
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-22 · Yadkin/Kaplan/18+6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Braden
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-01 · Yadkin/Kaplan/18+6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chanel Griggs
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-20 · Yadkin/Kaplan/18+6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chanel Griggs
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-08 · Yadkin/Hartsough/40+7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Thompson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-02 · Yadkin/Georgitis/40 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Kaplan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-09-30 · Yadkin/Haynes/18 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Deirdre Hjelt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-09-18 · Yadkin/Georgitis/40 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dana Alligood
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-09-17 · Yadkin/Georgitis/40 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tammy LaValley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2025-09-16 · Yadkin/Haynes/18 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Kaplan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-09-14 · Yadkin/Haynes/18 6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristie Moesner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
72.5%
37W–14L · 62.8% of games
3.5
35.6%
16W–29L · 44.7% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 27.1% of games
5.5
100%
7W–0L · 68.5% of games
6.5
75.9%
41W–13L · 60% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 71.6% of games
3.5mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 49.8% of games
6.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 68.6% of games
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 40.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
49 matches
#1 Singles
6%
12 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams