← Search

Sharon OConnor

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
REHOBOTH BEACH, DE
4.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
72 matches · 45W–27L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history72 matches
W
2025-04-29 · Piazza · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jake Brown mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-22 · Piazza · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jake Brown mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2022-11-13 · Staub · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathy Preisendorfer
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2022-11-05 · Staub · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Barry
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2022-09-28 · Staub · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Bryson
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
L
2022-09-19 · Staub · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslye Staub
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-3
L
2022-08-03 · Hot Shots · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Stevens
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2022-07-26 · Hot Shots · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Stevens
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2022-07-06 · Hot Shots · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Stevens
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2022-06-21 · McClelland · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2022-06-14 · McClelland · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Steffes
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2022-06-09 · Team Nelson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Holmes
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 52.4% of games
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 40% of games
3.5
70%
21W–9L · 58.2% of games
4.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 33.1% of games
6.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 62.8% of games
7.0
70%
7W–3L · 58% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
10 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer