← Search

John Mulvenna

— year-end
67 matches · 39W–28L · seasons 2020–2022

Captains: add John Mulvenna to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2022-09-24 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Rohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2022-09-17 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arthur Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2022-06-04 · SPANISH OAKS #2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2022-05-21 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Trexler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2022-05-15 · SPANISH OAKS #2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2022-05-07 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Santos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2022-04-23 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Trexler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2022-04-23 · SPANISH OAKS #2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chuck Creme
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2022-04-09 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Santos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2022-04-02 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Dominguez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2022-04-02 · SPANISH OAKS #2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2022-03-26 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams16 teams · 2020–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
70.8%
17W–7L · 57.4% of games
3.5
52%
13W–12L · 47% of games
4.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 34% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
15 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert