← Search

Rachel Milford

Las Vegas, NV
2.5C year-end 2024
88 matches · 32W–56L · seasons 2020–2024
Where Rachel sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Rachel is one of 123 women at 2.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 2.5 account for 3% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rachel has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.02.53.020202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Rachel has gone from the 9th to the 23rd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
39.1%
18W–28L · 47.1% of games
3.0
37.9%
11W–18L · 41.1% of games
6.0mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 40.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history88 matches
W
2024-04-16 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Graham
−0.025about as expected — took 67% of games against 70% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Rochelle Hamatian / Amanda Waby
2024-03-19 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Jones
+0.021better than expected — took 55% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Carrie Maddux / Judith Watson
2024-03-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Miriam Jimenez
+0.014about as expected — took 25% of games against 29% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Rita Spurgin / Mary Beth Zamani
2024-02-27 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roslyn Katz
−0.009about as expected — took 41% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
Avani Carkner / Danielle Caswell
2024-02-13 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roslyn Katz
+0.028better than expected — took 38% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Stacy Burr / Sarah Familian
2023-11-28 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roslyn Katz
−0.048below expectation — took 0% of games against 34% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Danielle Caswell / Kathryn Sloustcher
2023-11-14 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rita Spurgin
+0.104better than expected — took 80% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Valerie Witherspoon / Melissa Hicks
2023-10-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Jones
−0.031below expectation — took 0% of games against 29% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2023-10-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Jones
+0.019below expectation — took 8% of games against 15% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
ANN MARIE WEAVER / Diana Valencia
2023-10-03 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aldema Ridge
+0.007better than expected — took 65% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L
Crystal Ziebarth / Chelsi Grady
2023-09-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aldema Ridge
−0.052below expectation — took 29% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Trang Nguyen / Valentina Herzog
2023-09-19 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rita Spurgin
+0.006about as expected — took 44% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.