← Search

Cindy Brayer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Petersburg, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 1W–18L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history19 matches
L
2025-05-03 · RCSP Schwerin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Barham
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-04-19 · RCSP Schwerin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Gallman
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-08 · RCSP Schwerin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Braswell
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-02-10 · Pinellas/Faraci/18&Over3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Schoenbeck
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2023-06-03 · RCSP Faraci · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Seminara
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2023-05-12 · RCSP Faraci · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Seminara
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2023-02-11 · RCSP Faraci · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Seminara
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2023-02-04 · RCSP Faraci · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marti Pyle
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2021-10-31 · RCSP Yellow · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Brayer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2021-10-24 · RCSP Yellow · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Brayer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2021-05-23 · RCSP Yellow · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Brayer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
2021-05-16 · RCSP Yellow · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Brayer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 30.7% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–11L · 27% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 90% of the time
#3 Doubles
90%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
1 match
#2 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer