← Search

Sterling Andelin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Idaho Falls, ID
2.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 6W–10L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history16 matches
L
2024-08-16 · Idaho/Hall/65&Over6.0M · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bob Boozer Jr
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-08-13 · Idaho/Hall/65&Over6.0M · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Van Stosich
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-08-07 · Idaho/Hall/65&Over6.0M · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim Migel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-08-05 · Idaho/Hall/65&Over6.0M · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim Migel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2023-08-31 · Boozer · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brad Vande Kamp
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
W
2023-08-28 · Boozer · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Blaine Johnson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2023-08-24 · Boozer · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roger Atkinson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2023-08-16 · Boozer · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ron Clayton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2022-09-06 · Nelson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Terry Hale
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2022-09-01 · Nelson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Stosich
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2022-08-24 · Nelson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim Migel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2022-08-20 · Nelson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim Migel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
6.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 38.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal