Search

Paul Kassar

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2023
14 matches · 10W–4L · seasons 20222024
Where Paul sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Paul is one of 683 men at 3.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 23% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams4 teams · 2022–2024
IRV-Lewis/Rollier
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men
2024
N OR-IRV-Martinez
2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men
2023
IRV-Seidl
2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men
2022
IRV-Seidl
2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men
2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Paul has been 3.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.0202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
3.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 63.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history14 matches
W
2023-12-08 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.002about as expected — took 63% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2023-11-17 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.020better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2023-10-22 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.028better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2023-10-21 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.021better than expected — took 72% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
2023-10-01 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.029below expectation — took 44% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 4-4
L
Dan Kalishchamps
2023-08-26 · N OR-IRV-Martinez · #1 Singles
0.063below expectation — took 0% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Eric Bomanchamps
2023-08-25 · N OR-IRV-Martinez · #1 Singles
+0.039better than expected — took 54% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
2023-08-25 · N OR-IRV-Martinez · #3 Doubles · with Mark Alan
+0.027better than expected — took 80% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2023-04-29 · N OR-IRV-Martinez · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Naugler
+0.042better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2023-04-08 · N OR-IRV-Martinez · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tate Kuerbis
+0.050better than expected — took 80% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2022-05-07 · IRV-Seidl · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bryan Potter
0.044below expectation — took 20% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
2022-04-09 · IRV-Seidl · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joshua Lewis
+0.009better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.