Search

Craig Austin

Vancouver, WA
4.5S year-end 2026
11 matches · 2W–9L · seasons 20202022
Where Craig sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Craig is one of 395 men at 4.5 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 4.5 account for 98% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams22 teams · 2007–2022
VTC- McGirk
2022 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Men
2022
VTC-McGirk
2022 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men
2022
McGirk
2021 One Doubles · 4.5 Men
2021
CGM-Gomez
2020 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men
2020
CGM-McGirk
2019 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5+ Men
2019
CGM-Johnson/Yothers
2018 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men
2018
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Craig has been 4.5 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.04.5202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
4.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history11 matches
L
2022-06-12 · VTC- McGirk · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Kuribayashi
+0.009about as expected — took 37% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2022-05-08 · VTC- McGirk · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jack Yothers
0.062below expectation — took 29% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
David White / Thomas Turnbull
2022-04-16 · VTC- McGirk · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thomas McGirk
0.004about as expected — took 71% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2022-04-10 · VTC- McGirk · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Condit
0.053below expectation — took 25% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Albert Hensley / Matthew Smith
2022-03-18 · VTC-McGirk · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jack Yothers
+0.056better than expected — took 92% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2022-01-23 · VTC-McGirk · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jack Yothers
0.046below expectation — took 40% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2021-09-19 · McGirk · #1 Doubles · with Brenden Anderson
0.007about as expected — took 41% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Andrew Hyink / Justin Wrightchamps
2021-09-18 · McGirk · #1 Doubles · with Thomas McGirk
0.017below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2021-08-08 · McGirk · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thomas McGirk
0.005about as expected — took 41% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Michael Cheng / Anh Ngo
2021-07-09 · McGirk · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thomas McGirk
0.028below expectation — took 38% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Charlie Farrenkopf / Jack Krauel
2020-01-04 · CGM-Gomez · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brenden Anderson
0.012below expectation — took 40% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.