← Search

Peter McKittrick

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
8 matches · 7W–1L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history8 matches
W
2026-05-07 · NOR-MAC-Henderson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Posewitz
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-05-15 · N OR-MAC-Henderson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Posewitz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-05-08 · N OR-MAC-Henderson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Posewitz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-04-03 · N OR-MAC-Henderson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Krum
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 7-5
W
2019-10-27 · MAC-Aguilar · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Wiley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2019-10-06 · MAC-Aguilar · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Helmer III
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2019-09-15 · MAC-Aguilar · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rodrigo Aguilar
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2018-11-16 · MAC-Aguilar · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Bill Jackson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
8.0
100%
4W–0L · 64.2% of games
9.0
75%
3W–1L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert