← Search

Jane Marchionne

Reno, NV
4.0C year-end 2024
97 matches · 56W–41L · seasons 2019–2021
Where Jane sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Jane is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jane has been a steady 4.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.54.0201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jane has gone from the 95th to the 58th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
65.6%
21W–11L · 58.5% of games
4.5
33.3%
8W–16L · 42.3% of games
8.0
65.4%
17W–9L · 57.6% of games
9.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history97 matches
W
Janice Smith / Sylvia Williamschamps
2021-10-02 · #1 Doubles · with Judith MacKenzie
+0.055better than expected — took 71% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Allison Roberts / Lindsay Stoddard
2021-10-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Denise Antoniadis
+0.058better than expected — took 67% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Nancy Hallowell / Sally Berglundchamps
2021-10-01 · #1 Doubles · with Timora Cereghino
−0.025below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Marissa McGee / Kari Allen
2021-09-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pam Kirkendall
−0.030below expectation — took 67% of games against 72% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2021-09-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jill Gragson
−0.016below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Valerie Murphy / Monica Fracechamps
2021-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Diona Fonte
+0.043better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Anahi Sanchez / Namiko Slackchamps
2021-06-15 · #3 Doubles · with Teddy Stantcheva
+0.004about as expected — took 44% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2021-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelley Morgan
−0.027below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Aubrey Adams / Chelsea Loomis
2021-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Beverly Talaat
−0.035below expectation — took 8% of games against 34% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Jamaica Tan / Angela Mac
2021-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsi Steinberg
+0.075better than expected — took 86% of games against 47% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Valerie Murphy / Sally Zimmerman
2021-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lena Grotz
−0.026below expectation — took 53% of games against 63% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2021-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcy Saxe
−0.039below expectation — took 62% of games against 72% expected
7-5, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.