Paula Bissett
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richmond, VA
107 matches · 46W–61L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history107 matches
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2025
ACAC- Neumann
A ACAC Neumann
ACAC Bartholomew
ACAC Camden
ACAC Neumann
5 ACAC Neumann
ACAC Bartholomew
ACAC Callaghan / Bartholomew
ACAC Guerette
ACAC Linderman
ACAC Neumann
3 ACAC Shockley/Brodsky
4 MAC Greenspoon
ACAC Bartholomew
ACAC Callaghan / Bartholomew
ACAC Guerette
ACAC Neumann
ACAC Peters
ACAC Stephens
B1 ACAC Neumann
MAC Scott
MAC-Chronis
3 MAC Greenspoon
ACAC-Cubitt
B2 ACAC Stephens
B7 MAC Gold
MAC Scott
MAC-Chronis
ACAC Stephens
B7 MAC Greenspoon Racquettes
MAC-Gold
PM ACAC Peters / Linderman
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
41.4%
12W–17L · 48.1% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 51.3% of games
7.0
43.6%
17W–22L · 46.7% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 40.9% of games
6.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.2% of games
6.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.6% of games
7.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 45.3% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.