← Search

Brady Berry

BEND, OR
0.0 year-end
101 matches · 56W–45L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Brady sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Brady is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams68 teams · 2001–2023
SAC-Natarajan
2023 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2023
SAC-Wheeler/Boyce
2023 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men
2023
SAC-Harwood
2023 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2023
SAC-Natarajan
2023 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2023
SAC-Wheeler/Boyce
2022 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men
2022
SAC-Harwood/Boyce
2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Brady has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 5 seasons — 2 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Brady has gone from the 31st to the 7th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
73.9%
17W–6L · 59% of games
4.0
30%
6W–14L · 43.4% of games
7.0
90%
9W–1L · 60.5% of games
8.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 56.7% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 54.7% of games
8.0mixed
38.9%
7W–11L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history101 matches
L
2023-06-11 · SAC-Natarajan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Marsh
−0.014below expectation — took 8% of games against 28% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2023-06-04 · SAC-Natarajan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Marsh
+0.012about as expected — took 25% of games against 29% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
2023-04-29 · SAC-Natarajan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sam Ko
+0.023better than expected — took 54% of games against 45% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2023-04-23 · SAC-Harwood · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeannette Martinez
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2023-04-16 · SAC-Harwood · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeannette Martinez
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Jae Joon Kang / Noah Trubo
2023-03-19 · SAC-Natarajan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ajay Kumar Tippisetti
+0.028better than expected — took 47% of games against 39% expected
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Kevin Phan / Tyler Phengsynath
2023-02-26 · SAC-Natarajan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Zhou
+0.028about as expected — took 33% of games against 29% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Jordan Keomanivanh / Adam Oken
2023-01-08 · SAC-Natarajan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Zhou
−0.026below expectation — took 45% of games against 56% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Martin Jeffrey Binns / Vincent Robertson
2022-11-13 · SAC-Wheeler/Boyce · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig Frasier
−0.008about as expected — took 52% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2022-10-14 · SAC-Wheeler/Boyce · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shawn Boyce
+0.019better than expected — took 50% of games against 43% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Thomas Jordan / Deborah Kingsleychamps
2022-10-02 · #2 Doubles · with Theresa Berry
−0.060below expectation — took 14% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2022-10-01 · #2 Doubles · with Theresa Berry
−0.023below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.