← Search

Richard Sabo

Hood River, OR
5.0C year-end 2023
63 matches · 34W–29L · seasons 2019–2026
Where Richard sits
79
2.5
852
3.0
1347
3.5
980
4.0
435
4.5
80
5.0

Richard is one of 80 men at 5.0 in this cohort of 3773. Levels at or below 5.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Richard has been 5.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.55.0201920202021202220232026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 5.0, Richard has gone from the 21st to the 28th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
5.0
44.4%
12W–15L · 48.1% of games
10.0mixed
65%
13W–7L · 56.5% of games
9.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history63 matches
L
John Closi / Andrew Bryan
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Owen Suagee
+0.003about as expected — took 44% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
Martin Bats / Paul Reber
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Alexander Calpagiu
+0.050better than expected — took 67% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Marcus Eyth / Ian Paik
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Mark Chen
+0.063better than expected — took 47% of games against 30% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Mark Chen
+0.021better than expected — took 56% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Owen Suagee
−0.010below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Owen Suagee
−0.051below expectation — took 37% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Trent Prussing / Rachel Ayersmixed
2025-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Erica Mitchell
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Trent Prussing / Rachel Ayersmixed
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with JENNIFER BELOY
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 56% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
Henry Preacher / Megan Beyermixed
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amy Foley
+0.000below expectation — took 45% of games against 70% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Erica Lee / Cory Bemismixed
2025-10-10 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amy Foley
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 71% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Gram Leahy / Eric Pickard
2023-03-12 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Owen Suagee
−0.007about as expected — took 42% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Franklin Truong / Ethan Ogard
2023-02-25 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Alexander Calpagiu
−0.009about as expected — took 52% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.