Search

Silvio Wong

LAS VEGAS, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
76 matches · 33W–43L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.64
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
4%
down to 3.5
96%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
LAS VEGAS · 4.0
9 of 11
NV · 4.0
121 of 203

Silvio is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Silvio has been a steady 4.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.54.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Silvio has gone from the 27th to the 25th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
42.9%
21W–28L · 47.2% of games
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 60.1% of games
7.5mixed
20%
2W–8L · 41.5% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 44.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history76 matches
L
James Wilson / William Anderson
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allan-Robert Peetsalu
0.011below expectation — took 38% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
John Reenan / Andrew Lenssen
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeremy Christensen
0.010about as expected — took 43% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Dick Collum / Stephen Rutherford
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allan-Robert Peetsalu
0.002about as expected — took 44% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Teddy Stantcheva
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Aaron Schnitz / Michael Borenstein
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carter Kessler
+0.023better than expected — took 60% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-02 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.018about as expected — took 35% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
Marco Borremans / Stephanie Chenmixed
2026-03-01 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carla Eggleston
+0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Robert Martin / George Mulopulos
2026-02-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Roeben
+0.021better than expected — took 47% of games against 41% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Philip Luna / Richard van Diepen
2026-02-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allan-Robert Peetsalu
+0.071better than expected — took 67% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Marco Borremans / Michael Borenstein
2026-01-31 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carter Kessler
0.033below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Patrick ONeill / Byung-Yon Seo
2026-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Snow
+0.009about as expected — took 37% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-12-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackson Olsen
0.029below expectation — took 43% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.