← Search

Caitlin Eberle

WILSONVILLE, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 12W–23L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Caitlin Eberle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
W
2026-06-07 · SHC-Solomon/Riddle · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · SHC-Stoica · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-17 · SHC-Solomon/Riddle · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-11 · SHC-Stoica · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lisa Stoica
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-04 · SHC-Stoica · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lisa Stoica
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-19 · SHC-Monson · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Honorato Wenceslao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-10-05 · SHC-Monson · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jon Monson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-15 · SHC-Stoica · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sarah Ferrer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-10 · SHC-Stoica · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Allison Buchman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-05-03 · THPRD-Graham/Ly · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shannon Fraser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-19 · THPRD-Graham/Ly · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shannon Fraser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-04-18 · THPRD-Graham/Ly · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cathrine Olander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
75%
6W–2L · 59.6% of games
5.0
0%
0W–12L · 26.9% of games
10.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 45.9% of games
9.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
7 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert