Search

Caitlin Eberle

WILSONVILLE, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
32 matches · 12W–20L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.08
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
16%
down to 4.0
84%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 10% down · 90% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.10. Higher than today’s 4.08 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
OR · 4.5
117 of 226

Caitlin is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Caitlin has played at 5.0, 4.5 across 4 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

4.04.55.02020202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.5
75%
6W–2L · 59.6% of games
5.0
0%
0W–9L · 26.7% of games
10.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 45.9% of games
9.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history32 matches
W
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Hill
0.025below expectation — took 59% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · #1 Singles · 5.0
0.036below expectation — took 8% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Hill
+0.008better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Molly Aloia / Aimee Robinson
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lisa Stoica
0.029below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Tanya O'Neil / Morgan McIntosh
2026-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lisa Stoica
0.042below expectation — took 14% of games against 40% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-10-19 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Honorato Wenceslao
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Joshua Bradshaw / Wanqi Huangmixed
2025-10-05 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jon Monson
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Sandra Barnes / Lauren Skelly
2025-06-15 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sarah Ferrer
0.022below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2025-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Allison Buchman
0.008about as expected — took 40% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shannon Fraser
+0.011about as expected — took 56% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shannon Fraser
0.006about as expected — took 71% of games against 67% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cathrine Olander
0.022below expectation — took 55% of games against 60% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.