← Search

Peter Brown

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 27W–13L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Peter Brown to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Mark Johnston championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-06 · IRV-Johnson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-25 · IRV-Johnson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Hendrickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-03 · IRV-Johnson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Hendrickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-03-29 · IRV-Johnson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-06-21 · IRV-Boyer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Rake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-06-08 · IRV-Ford · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Justin Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-1
L
2025-05-04 · IRV-Ford · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nate Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-04-13 · IRV-Boyer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nate Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2024-03-30 · IRV-Boyer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nate Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2024-03-23 · IRV-Boyer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nate Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-03-17 · IRV-Boyer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nate Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 54.5% of games
4.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.3% of games
8.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 57.5% of games
9.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 53% of the time
#2 Doubles
53%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer