← Search

Jodi Landefeld

Kennewick, WA
0.0 year-end
60 matches · 29W–31L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Jodi sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Jodi is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jodi has been 4.5 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.04.52019202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Jodi has gone from the 28th to the 26th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.5
39.1%
9W–14L · 46.6% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.5% of games
9.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 54.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history60 matches
L
2023-08-26 · #3 Doubles · with Chrissy Morgan
+0.019about as expected — took 38% of games against 34% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2023-08-25 · #2 Doubles · with Chrissy Morgan
−0.003below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2023-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elece Fiocchi
−0.020below expectation — took 47% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2023-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elece Fiocchi
−0.003about as expected — took 61% of games against 60% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2023-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gina Ellison
−0.024below expectation — took 40% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2023-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chrissy Morgan
+0.017better than expected — took 47% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Peg Bogard / Gwendelyn Krause
2023-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gina Ellison
−0.002about as expected — took 52% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Erica Lee / Kari Bowton
2023-04-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gina Ellison
−0.063below expectation — took 20% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Susan Morrison / Jo Ann Kurz
2022-10-23 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Monique Eldridge
−0.013better than expected — took 80% of games against 74% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2022-10-23 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Monique Eldridge
−0.030below expectation — took 40% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
Kathleen Goyette / Debby Jones
2022-10-22 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Elizabeth Nott
+0.053better than expected — took 75% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2022-10-01 · #1 Doubles · with Mark Watson
−0.044below expectation — took 29% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.