← Search

Colin Parker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
12 matches · 3W–9L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history12 matches
W
2024-08-01 · FBey/CParker (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Staton mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-3
L
2024-07-30 · FBey/CParker (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charmaine Gittens mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-25 · FBey/CParker (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charmaine Gittens mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-11 · FBey/CParker (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fredia Waters mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7
L
2024-06-27 · FBey/CParker (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fredia Waters mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-20 · FBey/CParker (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lakesha Johnson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
W
N/A
2024-06-17 · FBey/CParker (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Franchone Bey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-06-13 · FBey/CParker (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lakesha Johnson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
L
2024-05-30 · FBey/CParker (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Franchone Bey mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
L
2023-06-27 · FBey (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bridget Happney mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 0-6
W
2023-06-06 · FBey (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bridget Happney mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2021-03-11 · TGillis/AJames (Jeff Adams) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Almon Barnwell
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 39.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 58% of the time
#3 Doubles
58%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer