← Search

Sarah Berkowitz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Park City, UT
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
33 matches · 16W–17L · seasons 2019–2022
Match history33 matches
L
2022-04-27 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk/Leigh · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Leigh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
2021-07-07 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk/Leigh · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcy Casp
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
W
2021-06-23 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk/Leigh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcy Casp
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2021-06-16 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk/Leigh · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristi Johnson
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2021-06-09 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk/Leigh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharree Olsen
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2020-07-22 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk/Leigh · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Bedell
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2020-07-09 · Park City MARC-Leigh/Epstein · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Bedell
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2020-07-01 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk/Leigh · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maree-Ann Tomczyk
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2020-06-30 · Park City MARC-Leigh/Epstein · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Bedell
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2020-06-17 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk/Leigh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maree-Ann Tomczyk
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2020-06-03 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk/Leigh · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maree-Ann Tomczyk
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2020-03-10 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maree-Ann Tomczyk
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 54.3% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 51.4% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe