← Search

Nick Ketcham

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 40W–16L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nick Ketcham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
W
2025-10-05 · MIBC-Barrett · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Erin Troedson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Lisa Debiec / Ben Falk - (DQ)
2025-09-27 · MIBC-Barrett · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tessie Decker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-05-17 · TCSP-Hartvigson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Colin Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2024-05-04 · TCSP-Hartvigson · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6
W
2024-04-14 · TCSP-Hartvigson · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2024-04-06 · TCSP-Hartvigson · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2023-05-19 · TCSP-Hartvigson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Colin Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-04-29 · TCSP-Hartvigson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Colin Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2023-03-31 · TCSP-Hartvigson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Colin Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2022-06-11 · #2 Doubles · with Todd Raymond championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2022-06-03 · TCSP-BAMF-Hartvigson · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tam Ly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2022-05-20 · TCSP-BAMF-Hartvigson · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
64%
16W–9L · 54.9% of games
4.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.2% of games
8.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 65.5% of games
9.0mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 60.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
19 matches
#1 Singles
30%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
5 matches
#1 Male Singles
7%
4 matches
#1 Male Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams