Teams

CHABOT CANYON 18AW2.5A

2026 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 2.5

16 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesKaty McCarthy / Alexis Gordon vs Anna Pana / Susan Malloy6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesOlja Dimitrijevic vs Carolyn Carlstroem2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLatoya Mcdonald / Jennifer Otte vs Selene Fabiano / Paula Gonzalez6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2026-06-07vs CLAREMONT R and S 18AW2.5ALost 12
L#1 DoublesAbby Dawkins / Caren McDonald vs Sally Baack / Vijaya Gadde1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJoey Laurent vs Noelle Martinez6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJessica McDevitt / Ellen Kinoy vs Rosa Li / Marianne Campbell1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesCaren McDonald / Siddhi Bahadkar vs Selene Fabiano / Paula Gonzalez6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesOlja Dimitrijevic vs Wendy Fairchild6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesArielle Chu / Latoya Mcdonald vs Susan Malloy / Samhita Bhargava7-6, 0-6, 1-0
2026-06-01vs SAN PABLO PK 18AW2.5AWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaty McCarthy / Arielle Chu vs Jules Davtyan / Valentina Villarroel3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJoey Laurent vs Elisenda Peters6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLatoya Mcdonald / Jessica McDevitt vs Christine trowbridge / maria garcia7-5, 6-4
2026-05-31vs LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 18AW2.5ALost 12
L#1 DoublesAbby Dawkins / Zina Kao vs Rose Toy / Alice Myerhoff7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSiddhi Bahadkar vs Myla Bush3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesClaire Chen Carter / Ellen Kinoy vs May Lee / Allyson Chernov7-5, 6-3
2026-05-24vs CLAREMONT R and S 18AW2.5ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesAbby Dawkins / Arielle Chu vs Rosa Li / Linda Hong6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEllen Kinoy / Olja Dimitrijevic vs Atlantis Langowski / Marianne Campbell6-1, 6-1
2026-05-20vs SAN PABLO PK 18AW2.5AWon 30
W#1 DoublesJessica McDevitt / Katy McCarthy vs Robin Cullen / Jules Davtyan2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJoey Laurent vs Cecilia Latapi6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Otte / Alexis Gordon vs Sarah Benjamin / maria garcia7-5, 6-3
L#1 DoublesClaire Chen Carter / Jessica McDevitt vs Anna Pana / Carol Kleiner2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesShang Zhu vs Kate Isenberg7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJennifer Otte / Natasha Desai vs Samhita Bhargava / Brittany de Lara6-7, 3-6
2026-04-25vs LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 18AW2.5ALost 12
W#1 DoublesCaren McDonald / Siddhi Bahadkar vs Olivia Mattox / Alexandra Mendoza6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesZina Kao vs Cassie Lin7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNatasha Desai / Katy McCarthy vs Deborah Hullings-Le / Susan Hua6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-04-13vs SAN PABLO PK 18AW2.5AWon 30
W#1 DoublesEllen Kinoy / Olja Dimitrijevic vs Jessica Trowbridge / Cecilia Latapi6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAbby Dawkins vs Elisenda Peters6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesZina Kao / Arielle Chu vs Sarah Benjamin / Jules Davtyan6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings34 teams · Women's 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SANTA CLARA TC/SANTA CLARA TENNIS C 18AW2.5A10025511176
2BROADSTONE RC 18AW2.5A9123715179
3NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW2.5A9124617185
4WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW2.5A9123717192
5BLACKHAWK CC 18AW2.5A9121920219
6LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 18AW2.5A82201026234
7SUNNYVALE MTC 18AW2.5A7322824226
8ALPINE HILLS 18AW2.5A73191125231
9FREMONT HILLS CC 18AW2.5A73181227242
10CLAREMONT R and S 18AW2.5A73181230249
11MEADOW STC 18AW2.5A73171330230
12BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 18AW2.5A64171328214
13GREEN VALLEY CC 18AW2.5A64181228219
14CHABOT CANYON 18AW2.5A55191126239
15BROOKSIDE 18AW2.5A55181228231
16MORAGA CC 18AW2.5A55151533248
17SLEEPY HOLLOW 18AW2.5A55151533251
18EL CERRITO TC/ARLINGTON PK 18AW2.5A55141636260
19MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 18AW2.5A55141636256
20GREENBROOK RS 18AW2.5A46151530236
21YMCA PRESIDIO 18AW2.5A46131735243
22RIO DEL ORO 18AW2.5A46121837285
23SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 18AW2.5B46111942305
24FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5A3311714111
25FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5B3361226185
26MORAGA VALLEY 18AW2.5A37121839279
27BACKESTO PK 18AW2.5A3762449315
28JOHNSON RANCH 18AW2.5A28102042313
29CASTLEWOOD CC 18AW2.5A2892144298
30ROUND HILL CC 18AW2.5A1982246315
31STANFORD-CRA 18AW2.5A1982249327
32SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 18AW2.5A1972350320
33BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AW2.5A01052550319
34SAN PABLO PK 18AW2.5A01042652334

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.49
Joey Laurent
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.46
Siddhi Bahadkar
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.43
Shang Zhu
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.42
Zina Kao
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.32
Claire Chen Carter
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.31
Alexis Gordon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.31
Caren McDonald
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.25
Latoya Mcdonald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Arielle Chu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.23
Abby Dawkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.22
Ellen Kinoy
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.18
Jennifer Otte
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.18
Olja Dimitrijevic
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
2.16
Katy McCarthy
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
1.99
Jessica McDevitt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Natasha Desai
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zina Kao + Abby Dawkins033 matchesnot enough data
Caren McDonald + Abby Dawkins033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joey Laurent
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%54%46%
2.49
Siddhi Bahadkar
6W–1L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%62%38%
2.46
Shang Zhu
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
0%70%30%
2.43
Zina Kao
10W–24L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%72%28%
2.42
2.5
Claire Chen Carter
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.32
Alexis Gordon
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
2.5
Caren McDonald
3W–5L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Latoya Mcdonald
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Arielle Chu
3W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Abby Dawkins
2W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Ellen Kinoy
6W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Jennifer Otte
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Olja Dimitrijevic
4W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Katy McCarthy
3W–5L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
Jessica McDevitt
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Natasha Desai
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.