Teams

FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5A

2026 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-14vs FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5BLost 12
W#1 DoublesNicole Otta / Molly Gipson vs Megan Klimper / Andria Wiegand6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAmy Fischer vs Gina Sommers6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJenna Straeter / Julianne Patrick vs Katie Anooshian / Annie Domingos4-6, 4-6
2026-05-30vs FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5BWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Fischer / Molly Gipson vs Annie Domingos / Megan Klimper6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLiz Mcafee vs Julia Di Piero6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNicole Otta / Jennifer Peterson vs Tara Grove / Andria Wiegand6-1, 6-0
2026-05-26vs FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5BLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulianne Patrick / Sarah Huelskamp vs Tara Grove / Katie Anooshian4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-05-21vs FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5BWon 30
W#1 DoublesMolly Gipson / Nicole Otta vs Julia Di Piero / Katie Anooshian6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAmy Fischer vs Megan Klimper6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Peterson / Sarah Huelskamp vs Annie Domingos / Andria Wiegand6-2, 6-1
2026-05-10vs FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5BWon 30
W#1 DoublesLiz Mcafee / Julianne Patrick vs Annie Domingos / Chelsea Boslaugh6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNicole Otta vs Tara Grove6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Fischer / Molly Gipson vs Julia Di Piero / Gina Sommers6-3, 6-2
2026-04-19vs FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5BLost 12
L#1 DoublesLiz Mcafee / Amy Fischer vs Chelsea Boslaugh / Megan Klimper4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMolly Gipson vs Gina Sommers3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Huelskamp / Jenna Straeter vs Tara Grove / Andria Wiegand6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings34 teams · Women's 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SANTA CLARA TC/SANTA CLARA TENNIS C 18AW2.5A10025511176
2BROADSTONE RC 18AW2.5A9123715179
3NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW2.5A9124617185
4WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW2.5A9123717192
5BLACKHAWK CC 18AW2.5A9121920219
6LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 18AW2.5A82201026234
7SUNNYVALE MTC 18AW2.5A7322824226
8ALPINE HILLS 18AW2.5A73191125231
9FREMONT HILLS CC 18AW2.5A73181227242
10CLAREMONT R and S 18AW2.5A73181230249
11MEADOW STC 18AW2.5A73171330230
12BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 18AW2.5A64171328214
13GREEN VALLEY CC 18AW2.5A64181228219
14CHABOT CANYON 18AW2.5A55191126239
15BROOKSIDE 18AW2.5A55181228231
16MORAGA CC 18AW2.5A55151533248
17SLEEPY HOLLOW 18AW2.5A55151533251
18EL CERRITO TC/ARLINGTON PK 18AW2.5A55141636260
19MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 18AW2.5A55141636256
20GREENBROOK RS 18AW2.5A46151530236
21YMCA PRESIDIO 18AW2.5A46131735243
22RIO DEL ORO 18AW2.5A46121837285
23SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 18AW2.5B46111942305
24FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5A3311714111
25FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5B3361226185
26MORAGA VALLEY 18AW2.5A37121839279
27BACKESTO PK 18AW2.5A3762449315
28JOHNSON RANCH 18AW2.5A28102042313
29CASTLEWOOD CC 18AW2.5A2892144298
30ROUND HILL CC 18AW2.5A1982246315
31STANFORD-CRA 18AW2.5A1982249327
32SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 18AW2.5A1972350320
33BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AW2.5A01052550319
34SAN PABLO PK 18AW2.5A01042652334

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.69
Nicole Otta
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.39
Molly Gipson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.35
Amy Fischer
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.32
Liz Mcafee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.18
Julianne Patrick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.14
Sarah Huelskamp
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jack Busby
published
Jenna Straeter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Otta
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%9%91%
2.69
Molly Gipson
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39
2.5
Amy Fischer
3W–2L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
Liz Mcafee
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.32
Julianne Patrick
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Sarah Huelskamp
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Jack Busby
14W–18L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jenna Straeter
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.