Teams

MEADOW STC 18AW2.5A

2026 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 2.5

20 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-06-08vs MORAGA CC 18AW2.5AWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeina Durkee / Emilia Hofmeister vs Sara Moore / Amy Loos6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSabrina Evers vs Perrisa Joorabchi6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCammie Slikker / Veena Vemuri vs Jessica Yau / Maureen Mccuaig6-0, 6-0
2026-06-07vs SLEEPY HOLLOW 18AW2.5ALost 03
L#1 DoublesVeena Vemuri / Cammie Slikker vs Lauren Disston / Dena McManis4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesVanessa Schuppenhauer vs Allison Weinstein1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Macrae / Angela Tran vs Lindsay Dahms / Liz Lawrence1-6, 2-6
2026-05-26vs ROUND HILL CC 18AW2.5ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesMonica Alami / Stacy Hersher vs Annalisa Graham / Kristin Bush4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNisha Fariss / Vanessa Schuppenhauer vs Gina Zahedi / Anita Mallott6-3, 6-2
2026-05-20vs MORAGA VALLEY 18AW2.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesNisha Fariss / Laura Gunn vs Bonnie Parisi / Angel Johnson6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTina Su vs Kate Goldman4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Macrae / Lydia Visser vs Sandy Uribe / Sian Newman6-0, 6-3
W#1 DoublesCammie Slikker / Katherine Ward vs Sheila Delargy / Elena Bentchev2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEmilia Hofmeister vs Avery Kim2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSabrina Evers / Margaret Rogers vs Christina Yeh / Linda Zheng4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMonica Alami / Veena Vemuri vs Elena Bentchev / Sheila Delargy6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLydia Visser vs Linda Zheng2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAngela Tran / Vanessa Schuppenhauer vs Laura Revelli / Laura Morrison1-6, 1-6
2026-05-05vs MORAGA CC 18AW2.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnna Zakasovskaya / Laura Gunn vs Megan Appelblom / Amy Loos7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMargaret Rogers vs Sara Munday6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEmily Fox / Stacy Hersher vs Maureen Mccuaig / Sara Moore6-1, 6-2
2026-04-30vs SLEEPY HOLLOW 18AW2.5ALost 12
W#1 DoublesLeina Durkee / Nisha Fariss vs Liz Lawrence / Jennifer Walker6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKrista Seiden vs Allison Weinstein2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Rogers / Angela Tran vs Juliana Bryant / Nancy Jiang4-6, 1-6
2026-04-22vs ROUND HILL CC 18AW2.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatherine Ward / Laura Gunn vs Gina Zahedi / Annalisa Graham6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSabrina Evers vs Amy Eichten6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichelle Macrae / Emily Fox vs Maria Angel-Ordonez / Kristin Bush0-6, 0-6
2026-04-18vs MORAGA VALLEY 18AW2.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmilia Hofmeister / Christina Latta vs Nicole Carter Mcgill / Bonnie Parisi6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesLydia Visser vs Laura Giverts3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVeena Vemuri / Stacy Hersher vs Angel Johnson / Elena Ayers6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings34 teams · Women's 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SANTA CLARA TC/SANTA CLARA TENNIS C 18AW2.5A10025511176
2BROADSTONE RC 18AW2.5A9123715179
3NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW2.5A9124617185
4WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW2.5A9123717192
5BLACKHAWK CC 18AW2.5A9121920219
6LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 18AW2.5A82201026234
7SUNNYVALE MTC 18AW2.5A7322824226
8ALPINE HILLS 18AW2.5A73191125231
9FREMONT HILLS CC 18AW2.5A73181227242
10CLAREMONT R and S 18AW2.5A73181230249
11MEADOW STC 18AW2.5A73171330230
12BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 18AW2.5A64171328214
13GREEN VALLEY CC 18AW2.5A64181228219
14CHABOT CANYON 18AW2.5A55191126239
15BROOKSIDE 18AW2.5A55181228231
16MORAGA CC 18AW2.5A55151533248
17SLEEPY HOLLOW 18AW2.5A55151533251
18EL CERRITO TC/ARLINGTON PK 18AW2.5A55141636260
19MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 18AW2.5A55141636256
20GREENBROOK RS 18AW2.5A46151530236
21YMCA PRESIDIO 18AW2.5A46131735243
22RIO DEL ORO 18AW2.5A46121837285
23SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 18AW2.5B46111942305
24FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5A3311714111
25FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5B3361226185
26MORAGA VALLEY 18AW2.5A37121839279
27BACKESTO PK 18AW2.5A3762449315
28JOHNSON RANCH 18AW2.5A28102042313
29CASTLEWOOD CC 18AW2.5A2892144298
30ROUND HILL CC 18AW2.5A1982246315
31STANFORD-CRA 18AW2.5A1982249327
32SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 18AW2.5A1972350320
33BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AW2.5A01052550319
34SAN PABLO PK 18AW2.5A01042652334

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Leina Durkee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Krista Seiden
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.62
Emilia Hofmeister
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.60
Katherine Ward
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Tina Su
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.55
Christina Latta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.49
Emily Fox
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Sabrina Evers
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.47
Veena Vemuri
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.46
Lydia Visser
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.39
Anna Zakasovskaya
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.37
Stacy Hersher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.34
Nisha Fariss
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.33
Cammie Slikker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.24
Monica Alami
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.22
Laura Gunn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.18
Vanessa Schuppenhauer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.17
Margaret Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.15
Michelle Macrae
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.75
Angela Tran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leina Durkee
9W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%10%90%
2.68
Krista Seiden
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
0%18%82%
2.63
Emilia Hofmeister
7W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%20%80%
2.62
Katherine Ward
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%25%75%
2.60
Tina Su
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%35%65%
2.55
2.5
Christina Latta
4W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%37%63%
2.55
Emily Fox
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
Sabrina Evers
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%56%44%
2.48
Veena Vemuri
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%59%41%
2.47
Lydia Visser
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%60%40%
2.46
2.5
Anna Zakasovskaya
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
Stacy Hersher
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
Nisha Fariss
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
2.5
Cammie Slikker
2W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
Monica Alami
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Laura Gunn
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Vanessa Schuppenhauer
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Margaret Rogers
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Michelle Macrae
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
2.5
Angela Tran
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.