Teams

FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5B

2026 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-14vs FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5AWon 21
L#1 DoublesMegan Klimper / Andria Wiegand vs Nicole Otta / Molly Gipson0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesGina Sommers vs Amy Fischer1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKatie Anooshian / Annie Domingos vs Jenna Straeter / Julianne Patrick6-4, 6-4
2026-05-30vs FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5ALost 03
L#1 DoublesAnnie Domingos / Megan Klimper vs Amy Fischer / Molly Gipson0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJulia Di Piero vs Liz Mcafee1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTara Grove / Andria Wiegand vs Nicole Otta / Jennifer Peterson1-6, 0-6
2026-05-26vs FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5AWon 20
W#1 DoublesTara Grove / Katie Anooshian vs Julianne Patrick / Sarah Huelskamp6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGina Sommers vs Jennifer Peterson6-0, 6-1
2026-05-21vs FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5ALost 03
L#1 DoublesJulia Di Piero / Katie Anooshian vs Molly Gipson / Nicole Otta1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMegan Klimper vs Amy Fischer3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnnie Domingos / Andria Wiegand vs Jennifer Peterson / Sarah Huelskamp2-6, 1-6
2026-05-10vs FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5ALost 03
L#1 DoublesAnnie Domingos / Chelsea Boslaugh vs Liz Mcafee / Julianne Patrick2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTara Grove vs Nicole Otta0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Di Piero / Gina Sommers vs Amy Fischer / Molly Gipson3-6, 2-6
2026-04-19vs FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesChelsea Boslaugh / Megan Klimper vs Liz Mcafee / Amy Fischer6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesGina Sommers vs Molly Gipson6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTara Grove / Andria Wiegand vs Sarah Huelskamp / Jenna Straeter2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings34 teams · Women's 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SANTA CLARA TC/SANTA CLARA TENNIS C 18AW2.5A10025511176
2BROADSTONE RC 18AW2.5A9123715179
3NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW2.5A9124617185
4WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW2.5A9123717192
5BLACKHAWK CC 18AW2.5A9121920219
6LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 18AW2.5A82201026234
7SUNNYVALE MTC 18AW2.5A7322824226
8ALPINE HILLS 18AW2.5A73191125231
9FREMONT HILLS CC 18AW2.5A73181227242
10CLAREMONT R and S 18AW2.5A73181230249
11MEADOW STC 18AW2.5A73171330230
12BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 18AW2.5A64171328214
13GREEN VALLEY CC 18AW2.5A64181228219
14CHABOT CANYON 18AW2.5A55191126239
15BROOKSIDE 18AW2.5A55181228231
16MORAGA CC 18AW2.5A55151533248
17SLEEPY HOLLOW 18AW2.5A55151533251
18EL CERRITO TC/ARLINGTON PK 18AW2.5A55141636260
19MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 18AW2.5A55141636256
20GREENBROOK RS 18AW2.5A46151530236
21YMCA PRESIDIO 18AW2.5A46131735243
22RIO DEL ORO 18AW2.5A46121837285
23SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 18AW2.5B46111942305
24FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5A3311714111
25FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5B3361226185
26MORAGA VALLEY 18AW2.5A37121839279
27BACKESTO PK 18AW2.5A3762449315
28JOHNSON RANCH 18AW2.5A28102042313
29CASTLEWOOD CC 18AW2.5A2892144298
30ROUND HILL CC 18AW2.5A1982246315
31STANFORD-CRA 18AW2.5A1982249327
32SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 18AW2.5A1972350320
33BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AW2.5A01052550319
34SAN PABLO PK 18AW2.5A01042652334

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.08 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.34
Gina Sommers
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.27
Katie Anooshian
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Chelsea Boslaugh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.09
Annie Domingos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.06
Tara Grove
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.04
Megan Klimper
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
1.99
Andria Wiegand
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.80
Julia Di Piero
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gina Sommers
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
Katie Anooshian
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Chelsea Boslaugh
14W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Annie Domingos
1W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Tara Grove
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Megan Klimper
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Andria Wiegand
0W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Julia Di Piero
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.