Teams

CLAREMONT R and S 18AW2.5A

2026 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 2.5

16 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-06-13vs SAN PABLO PK 18AW2.5AWon 30
W#1 DoublesSally Baack / Diane Heinze vs Christina Lee / Elisenda Peters6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNoelle Martinez vs Robin Cullen2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRosa Li / Amy Tharpe Peterson vs maria garcia / Jessica Trowbridge2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-07vs CHABOT CANYON 18AW2.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesSally Baack / Vijaya Gadde vs Abby Dawkins / Caren McDonald6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesNoelle Martinez vs Joey Laurent0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRosa Li / Marianne Campbell vs Jessica McDevitt / Ellen Kinoy6-1, 6-2
2026-05-31vs SAN PABLO PK 18AW2.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesRosa Li / Renee Pacheco vs Julia Herring / Jules Davtyan6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAtlantis Langowski vs Valentina Villarroel3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDiane Heinze / Marianne Campbell vs Christina Lee / maria garcia7-5, 6-2
2026-05-24vs CHABOT CANYON 18AW2.5ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesRosa Li / Linda Hong vs Abby Dawkins / Arielle Chu4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAtlantis Langowski / Marianne Campbell vs Ellen Kinoy / Olja Dimitrijevic1-6, 1-6
2026-05-23vs LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 18AW2.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesLinda Hong / Rosa Li vs Rose Toy / Alexandra Mendoza6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNoelle Martinez vs Cassie Lin6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMarianne Campbell / Atlantis Langowski vs Olivia Mattox / May Lee3-6, 5-7
2026-05-17vs LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 18AW2.5ALost 12
W#1 DoublesRosa Li / Linda Hong vs Diana Cin / Alice Myerhoff6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesHolly Fuller vs Alexandra Mendoza2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Pacheco / Amy Tharpe Peterson vs Cassie Lin / Deborah Hullings-Le6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesVijaya Gadde / Diane Heinze vs Wendy Fairchild / Mariella Nightingale6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarianne Campbell / Merl Ross vs Anna Pana / Carol Kleiner6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesLeah Martinez-kjellen / Merl Ross vs Susan Malloy / Carol Kleiner6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAtlantis Langowski vs Kate Isenberg0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarianne Campbell / Renee Pacheco vs Anna Pana / Samhita Bhargava3-5
L#1 DoublesLinda Hong / Monica Mehta vs Carolyn Carlstroem / Mariella Nightingale4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesRenee Pacheco vs Wendy Fairchild6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLeah Martinez-kjellen / Atlantis Langowski vs Selene Fabiano / Carol Kleiner6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-04-18vs LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 18AW2.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiane Heinze / Monica Mehta vs Olivia Mattox / Rose Toy6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAmy Tharpe Peterson vs Cassie Lin6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLeah Martinez-kjellen / Renee Pacheco vs Diana Cin / Laila Grassley0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings34 teams · Women's 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SANTA CLARA TC/SANTA CLARA TENNIS C 18AW2.5A10025511176
2BROADSTONE RC 18AW2.5A9123715179
3NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW2.5A9124617185
4WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW2.5A9123717192
5BLACKHAWK CC 18AW2.5A9121920219
6LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 18AW2.5A82201026234
7SUNNYVALE MTC 18AW2.5A7322824226
8ALPINE HILLS 18AW2.5A73191125231
9FREMONT HILLS CC 18AW2.5A73181227242
10CLAREMONT R and S 18AW2.5A73181230249
11MEADOW STC 18AW2.5A73171330230
12BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 18AW2.5A64171328214
13GREEN VALLEY CC 18AW2.5A64181228219
14CHABOT CANYON 18AW2.5A55191126239
15BROOKSIDE 18AW2.5A55181228231
16MORAGA CC 18AW2.5A55151533248
17SLEEPY HOLLOW 18AW2.5A55151533251
18EL CERRITO TC/ARLINGTON PK 18AW2.5A55141636260
19MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 18AW2.5A55141636256
20GREENBROOK RS 18AW2.5A46151530236
21YMCA PRESIDIO 18AW2.5A46131735243
22RIO DEL ORO 18AW2.5A46121837285
23SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 18AW2.5B46111942305
24FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5A3311714111
25FIG GARDEN 18AW2.5B3361226185
26MORAGA VALLEY 18AW2.5A37121839279
27BACKESTO PK 18AW2.5A3762449315
28JOHNSON RANCH 18AW2.5A28102042313
29CASTLEWOOD CC 18AW2.5A2892144298
30ROUND HILL CC 18AW2.5A1982246315
31STANFORD-CRA 18AW2.5A1982249327
32SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 18AW2.5A1972350320
33BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AW2.5A01052550319
34SAN PABLO PK 18AW2.5A01042652334

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.29 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.69
Diane Heinze
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
2.52
Rosa Li
usually #1 Singles 31%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
2.51
Vijaya Gadde
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.41
Linda Hong
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.41
Merl Ross
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.39
Sally Baack
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.38
Jeri Jones
published
2.28
Noelle Martinez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.27
Monica Mehta
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.18
Marianne Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.10
Leah Martinez-kjellen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.04
Renee Pacheco
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.02
Atlantis Langowski
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
1.92
Amy Tharpe Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Holly Fuller
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
K Chung
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeri Jones + Sally Baack123 matchesnot enough data
Monica Mehta + Vijaya Gadde213 matchesnot enough data
Linda Hong + Rosa Li303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Diane Heinze
10W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%8%92%
2.69
Rosa Li
17W–6L career · 15 lines in 2026
0%44%56%
2.52
Vijaya Gadde
14W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%48%52%
2.51
Linda Hong
5W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
Merl Ross
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.41
Sally Baack
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39
Jeri Jones
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
Noelle Martinez
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.28
Monica Mehta
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Marianne Campbell
5W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Leah Martinez-kjellen
5W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Renee Pacheco
2W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Atlantis Langowski
5W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Amy Tharpe Peterson
2W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Holly Fuller
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
K Chung
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.