Teams

Oxford Mill (Brie Branting)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 2.5 Women (1S

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesMelissa Byington / Nancy Vo vs Crystal Mendoza / Kayla Rose5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBrie Branting vs Sridevi Sadagopan5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPooja Mehta / Michelle Aguana vs Revathy Raghunathan / Bharathi Gandla0-6, 3-6
2025-06-29vs St Ives (Sarah Warford)*Won 20
W#1 DoublesMelissa Byington / Nancy Vo vs Melissa Clements / Kaitlin Waters6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesBrie Branting vs Lia Picard6-1, 6-0
2025-06-22vs Brookfield (Angela Drake)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMelissa Byington / Daniela Albisu vs Kaitlyn Owens / Elizabeth Hartman0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSelina Mendoza vs Angela Drake0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMeredith Nichols / Michelle Aguana vs Mollie Hady / Hillary Walton4-6, 2-6
2025-06-15vs Rivermoore Park (Julia Kempler)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesLindsey Cassell / Brie Branting vs Michelle Landrum / Trisha McRoberts6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSelina Mendoza vs Young Song0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Byington / Nancy Vo vs Julia Kempler / Shalini Broderick6-1, 6-1
2025-06-08vs CC of Roswell (Kim Harvill)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Vo / Meredith Nichols vs Marta Church / Sherry Personette3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLindsey Cassell vs Anna Auladell7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesPooja Mehta / Daniela Albisu vs Alexandra Henson / Leslie Shelnutt6-1, 6-3
2025-05-30vs The Manor (Tannaz Moderasi)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLissette Mendoza / Selina Mendoza vs Tannaz Modaresi / Devin Judge2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLindsey Cassell vs Heela Popal6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDaniela Albisu / Pooja Mehta vs Darlene Donlan / Kate Boscoe4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings22 teams · 2.5 Women (1S
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Washington Park (DeAnna Daniel)*7017410132
2Sawnee Mountain Park (Sridevi Sadagopan)*601448105
3USTA Atlanta/Kim Gruber6116512141
4Windy Hill AC (Marion Coldonat)*5114412148
5Terell Mill (Ashley Abernathy)*5112616169
6Bitsy Grant (Maya Jackson)*5215614139
7Brookfield (Angela Drake)*4212612102
8Dunwoody CC (Allison Daly)*4210818144
9Summit Smoke (Jess Barre)*3310816136
10CC of Roswell (Kim Harvill)*339918149
11Oxford Mill (Brie Branting)*3381020154
12Capital City (Sara Kate Rumsey)*3381022181
13Bitsy Grant (Kitae Kim)*34101124197
14Sugar Creek (Britt Flanigan)*3491225207
15Rivermoore Park (Julia Kempler)*2410816124
16The Manor (Tannaz Moderasi)*2451328197
17Bitsy Grant (Angela Fairfax)*2571430205
18Life Time (Kandis Anderson-Grant)*1561225176
19St Ives (Sarah Warford)*1551326188
20Bitsy Grant (Janice Wong)*1651633229
21Sugar Creek (Nneoma Elendu)*1651633242
22Chastain (Amy Azad)*0621633232

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.49
Lindsey Cassell
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.48
Melissa Byington
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.43
Brie Branting
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.16
Nancy Vo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.12
Pooja Mehta
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.04
Daniela Albisu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.02
Selina Mendoza
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.00
Michelle Aguana
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.94
Meredith Nichols
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lissette Mendoza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Vo + Melissa Byington213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsey Cassell
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
Melissa Byington
3W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%56%44%
2.48
2.5
Brie Branting
4W–1L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
0%69%31%
2.43
Nancy Vo
3W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
Pooja Mehta
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
2.5
Daniela Albisu
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Selina Mendoza
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Michelle Aguana
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Meredith Nichols
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Lissette Mendoza
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.