Teams

CC of Roswell (Kim Harvill)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 2.5 Women (1S

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-13vs Brookfield (Angela Drake)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMarta Church / Alexandra Henson vs Natalie Denton / Shanna Allison1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLiv Oliveira vs Angela Drake2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Larkins / Leslie Shelnutt vs Christina Carter / Ashley Everette0-6, 1-6
2025-07-06vs Rivermoore Park (Julia Kempler)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesFrancesca Williams / Leslie Shelnutt vs Jennifer Brozowski / Michelle Landrum5-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesAnna Auladell vs Megan Smith6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLiv Oliveira / Marta Church vs Trisha McRoberts / Elizabeth Wood6-2, 7-5
2025-06-22vs The Manor (Tannaz Moderasi)*Won 20
W#1 DoublesFrancesca Williams / Marta Church vs Stephanie Konkle / Carolina Velez6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLeah Mazar / Alexandra Henson vs Kimberly Meisel / Abby Uppal6-1, 6-0
L#1 DoublesSherry Personette / Francesca Williams vs Sridevi Sadagopan / Crystal Mendoza3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLiv Oliveira vs Bharathi Gandla6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKim Drye / Megan Larkins vs Shubha Dwarakanath / Kayla Rose0-6, 0-6
2025-06-08vs Oxford Mill (Brie Branting)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMarta Church / Sherry Personette vs Nancy Vo / Meredith Nichols6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAnna Auladell vs Lindsey Cassell5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAlexandra Henson / Leslie Shelnutt vs Pooja Mehta / Daniela Albisu1-6, 3-6
2025-06-01vs St Ives (Sarah Warford)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesMarta Church / Sherry Personette vs Elizabeth Ives / Diana Gomez1-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesLiv Oliveira vs Nicole Wetmore6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKim Drye / Francesca Williams vs Lauren Ledford / Sarah Watford7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings22 teams · 2.5 Women (1S
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Washington Park (DeAnna Daniel)*7017410132
2Sawnee Mountain Park (Sridevi Sadagopan)*601448105
3USTA Atlanta/Kim Gruber6116512141
4Windy Hill AC (Marion Coldonat)*5114412148
5Terell Mill (Ashley Abernathy)*5112616169
6Bitsy Grant (Maya Jackson)*5215614139
7Brookfield (Angela Drake)*4212612102
8Dunwoody CC (Allison Daly)*4210818144
9Summit Smoke (Jess Barre)*3310816136
10CC of Roswell (Kim Harvill)*339918149
11Oxford Mill (Brie Branting)*3381020154
12Capital City (Sara Kate Rumsey)*3381022181
13Bitsy Grant (Kitae Kim)*34101124197
14Sugar Creek (Britt Flanigan)*3491225207
15Rivermoore Park (Julia Kempler)*2410816124
16The Manor (Tannaz Moderasi)*2451328197
17Bitsy Grant (Angela Fairfax)*2571430205
18Life Time (Kandis Anderson-Grant)*1561225176
19St Ives (Sarah Warford)*1551326188
20Bitsy Grant (Janice Wong)*1651633229
21Sugar Creek (Nneoma Elendu)*1651633242
22Chastain (Amy Azad)*0621633232

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.12 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.55
Anna Auladell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.52
Francesca Williams
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.36
Liv Oliveira
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.31
Leah Mazar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.17
Lindsey Dixon
published
2.14
Marta Church
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.03
Sherry Personette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.01
Alexandra Henson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.83
Kim Drye
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.72
Leslie Shelnutt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.72
Megan Larkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kim Harvill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherry Personette + Marta Church2446% games+3.6% vs expected
Megan Larkins + Sherry Personette1522% games−12.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anna Auladell
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55
Francesca Williams
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%45%55%
2.52
Liv Oliveira
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
Leah Mazar
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Lindsey Dixon
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Marta Church
5W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Sherry Personette
7W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
2.5
Alexandra Henson
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Kim Drye
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.83
Leslie Shelnutt
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.72
Megan Larkins
3W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.72
Kim Harvill
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.