Teams

St Ives (Sarah Warford)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 2.5 Women (1S

14 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-13vs The Manor (Tannaz Moderasi)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDiana Gomez / Melissa Clements vs Abby Uppal / Stephanie Konkle7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLia Picard vs Heela Popal0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJazmine Simon / Kay Dorelus vs Kimberly Meisel / Tannaz Modaresi2-6, 6-2, 5-7
L#1 DoublesNicole Wetmore / Elizabeth Ives vs Crystal Mendoza / Kayla Rose0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKay Dorelus vs Sridevi Sadagopan0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Watford / Ashley Nordsiek vs Shubha Dwarakanath / Ashlee Wallingford1-6, 0-6
2025-06-29vs Oxford Mill (Brie Branting)*Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa Clements / Kaitlin Waters vs Melissa Byington / Nancy Vo1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesLia Picard vs Brie Branting1-6, 0-6
2025-06-15vs Brookfield (Angela Drake)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesKaitlin Waters / Diana Gomez vs Kelly Beeson / Christina Carter6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLauren Ledford vs Angela Drake0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKay Dorelus / Zeenat Syed vs Kaitlyn Owens / Lauren Yates0-6, 0-6
2025-06-08vs Rivermoore Park (Julia Kempler)*Split 11
W#1 DoublesMelissa Clements / Lauren Ledford vs Elizabeth Lewis / Jennifer Brozowski6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSarah Watford / Jane Gandhi vs Trisha McRoberts / Young Song1-6, 1-6
2025-06-01vs CC of Roswell (Kim Harvill)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Ives / Diana Gomez vs Marta Church / Sherry Personette6-1, 7-6
L#1 SinglesNicole Wetmore vs Liv Oliveira1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Ledford / Sarah Watford vs Kim Drye / Francesca Williams5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings22 teams · 2.5 Women (1S
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Washington Park (DeAnna Daniel)*7017410132
2Sawnee Mountain Park (Sridevi Sadagopan)*601448105
3USTA Atlanta/Kim Gruber6116512141
4Windy Hill AC (Marion Coldonat)*5114412148
5Terell Mill (Ashley Abernathy)*5112616169
6Bitsy Grant (Maya Jackson)*5215614139
7Brookfield (Angela Drake)*4212612102
8Dunwoody CC (Allison Daly)*4210818144
9Summit Smoke (Jess Barre)*3310816136
10CC of Roswell (Kim Harvill)*339918149
11Oxford Mill (Brie Branting)*3381020154
12Capital City (Sara Kate Rumsey)*3381022181
13Bitsy Grant (Kitae Kim)*34101124197
14Sugar Creek (Britt Flanigan)*3491225207
15Rivermoore Park (Julia Kempler)*2410816124
16The Manor (Tannaz Moderasi)*2451328197
17Bitsy Grant (Angela Fairfax)*2571430205
18Life Time (Kandis Anderson-Grant)*1561225176
19St Ives (Sarah Warford)*1551326188
20Bitsy Grant (Janice Wong)*1651633229
21Sugar Creek (Nneoma Elendu)*1651633242
22Chastain (Amy Azad)*0621633232

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.09 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.35
Elizabeth Ives
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.31
Lauren Ledford
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ashley Nordsiek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Emily Morgan
published 2.5
2.23
Kaitlin Waters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.20
Diana Gomez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.09
Lia Picard
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.02
Nicole Wetmore
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
1.99
Jazmine Simon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.85
Kay Dorelus
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
1.78
Sarah Watford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jane Gandhi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Clements
published
Zeenat Syed
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Ives + Nicole Wetmore2344% gamesnot enough data
Kaitlin Waters + Diana Gomez213 matchesnot enough data
Kay Dorelus + Jazmine Simon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Elizabeth Ives
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.35
Lauren Ledford
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Ashley Nordsiek
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Emily Morgan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kaitlin Waters
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Diana Gomez
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
Lia Picard
4W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Nicole Wetmore
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Jazmine Simon
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Kay Dorelus
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.85
Sarah Watford
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.78
Jane Gandhi
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Clements
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Zeenat Syed
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.