Teams

Bitsy Grant (Janice Wong)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 2.5 Women (1S

10 players · average NTRP 2.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-13vs Bitsy Grant (Kitae Kim)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCarly Smith / Kim Nogi vs Greer Gorman / Jennifer Duncan3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesStarr McClinton vs Melissa Oye3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Wong / Toni Wong vs Jessica Story / Lorna Gitari4-6, 6-4, 2-6
2025-07-06vs Sugar Creek (Nneoma Elendu)*Split 11
L#1 DoublesToni Wong / Manisha Katta vs Nneoma Elendu / Shanice Saunders5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCarly Smith / Kim Nogi vs Christina Brantley / Amber Davis6-4, 4-6, 6-0
2025-06-29vs Washington Park (DeAnna Daniel)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAmber Rogers / Alexandra Guidry vs DeAnna Daniel / Hanifah Hardwick7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesToni Wong vs Lavashlyn Lowery2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCarly Smith / Janice Wong vs Maegan Moguel / Andrea Seward4-6, 1-6
2025-06-22vs USTA Atlanta/Kim GruberLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmber Rogers / Alexandra Guidry vs Shelley Leonta / Joy Taylor6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesStarr McClinton vs Ryleigh Harris1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Wong / Toni Wong vs Taylor Brown / Dylan Brown3-6, 3-6
2025-06-15vs Sugar Creek (Britt Flanigan)*Lost 02
L#1 DoublesStarr McClinton / Toni Wong vs Michelina Walcott / Brittany Flanigan5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesManisha Katta / Katuschka Rakovec vs Carol Rey / Chanda Harrison1-6, 0-6
2025-06-08vs Bitsy Grant (Angela Fairfax)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKatuschka Rakovec / Casey Horton vs Mollie Fiero / Katie Morgan1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesStarr McClinton vs Maura Devetski1-6, 6-4, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Guidry / Amber Rogers vs Elizabeth Holden / Elizabeth Poland6-2, 6-3
2025-06-01vs Bitsy Grant (Maya Jackson)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Nogi / Alexandra Guidry vs Marnagee Scott / Tykira Henry0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAmber Rogers vs Maya Jackson0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesToni Wong / Manisha Katta vs Ashley Leboeuf / Jessica Rogers2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings22 teams · 2.5 Women (1S
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Washington Park (DeAnna Daniel)*7017410132
2Sawnee Mountain Park (Sridevi Sadagopan)*601448105
3USTA Atlanta/Kim Gruber6116512141
4Windy Hill AC (Marion Coldonat)*5114412148
5Terell Mill (Ashley Abernathy)*5112616169
6Bitsy Grant (Maya Jackson)*5215614139
7Brookfield (Angela Drake)*4212612102
8Dunwoody CC (Allison Daly)*4210818144
9Summit Smoke (Jess Barre)*3310816136
10CC of Roswell (Kim Harvill)*339918149
11Oxford Mill (Brie Branting)*3381020154
12Capital City (Sara Kate Rumsey)*3381022181
13Bitsy Grant (Kitae Kim)*34101124197
14Sugar Creek (Britt Flanigan)*3491225207
15Rivermoore Park (Julia Kempler)*2410816124
16The Manor (Tannaz Moderasi)*2451328197
17Bitsy Grant (Angela Fairfax)*2571430205
18Life Time (Kandis Anderson-Grant)*1561225176
19St Ives (Sarah Warford)*1551326188
20Bitsy Grant (Janice Wong)*1651633229
21Sugar Creek (Nneoma Elendu)*1651633242
22Chastain (Amy Azad)*0621633232

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.15 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Alexandra Guidry
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Amber Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Casey Horton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Starr McClinton
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.17
Carly Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.00
Toni Wong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.86
Katuschka Rakovec
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
1.84
Kim Nogi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.78
Manisha Katta
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Janice Wong
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexandra Guidry + Amber Rogers5082% games+23.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alexandra Guidry
7W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Amber Rogers
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Casey Horton
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Starr McClinton
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Carly Smith
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Toni Wong
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Katuschka Rakovec
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Kim Nogi
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.84
Manisha Katta
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.78
Janice Wong
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.