Teams

Summit Smoke (Jess Barre)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 2.5 Women (1S

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-13vs Capital City (Sara Kate Rumsey)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesTammy Leitch / Michele Ramdeo vs Allyson Funk / Carney Underwood6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLee Ann Harris vs Kelsey Dalene4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTracey Bankhead / Jess Barre vs Lauren Wilson / Casey Ogie2-6, 4-6
2025-07-06vs Terell Mill (Ashley Abernathy)*Lost 02
L#1 DoublesEllen White / Stephanie Train vs Annslee Vess / Madison Blejwas2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMichelle Garcia / Ingrid McGaughey vs Madison Winship / Lauren Coley6-2, 2-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesAudrey Bankhead / Tammy Leitch vs Kandis Anderson-Grant / Olivia Johnson6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJess Barre vs Latoya McGowan0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Train / Michelle Garcia vs Naomi Galeano / Emily Zhang6-0, 6-0
2025-06-22vs Windy Hill AC (Marion Coldonat)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLee Ann Harris / Erin Jones vs Ubol Pongsai / Andrea Myers3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTammy Leitch vs Holly Williams3-6, 6-4, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTracey Bankhead / Margaret Lane vs Johana Benefield / Vanessa Bassani4-6, 5-7
2025-06-15vs Chastain (Amy Azad)*Won 20
W#1 DoublesMaria Molinelli / Michele Ramdeo vs Sarah Burkeen / Imani Sinclair6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesIngrid McGaughey / Ellen White vs Amy Azad / Elise Polo6-3, 6-3
2025-06-01vs Dunwoody CC (Allison Daly)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesErin Jones / Michele Ramdeo vs Mary Catherine Riddick / Leanne Raxter6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLee Ann Harris vs Kaitlyn Campbell6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMaria Molinelli / Audrey Bankhead vs Lauren Lauricella / Melanie Skijus6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings22 teams · 2.5 Women (1S
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Washington Park (DeAnna Daniel)*7017410132
2Sawnee Mountain Park (Sridevi Sadagopan)*601448105
3USTA Atlanta/Kim Gruber6116512141
4Windy Hill AC (Marion Coldonat)*5114412148
5Terell Mill (Ashley Abernathy)*5112616169
6Bitsy Grant (Maya Jackson)*5215614139
7Brookfield (Angela Drake)*4212612102
8Dunwoody CC (Allison Daly)*4210818144
9Summit Smoke (Jess Barre)*3310816136
10CC of Roswell (Kim Harvill)*339918149
11Oxford Mill (Brie Branting)*3381020154
12Capital City (Sara Kate Rumsey)*3381022181
13Bitsy Grant (Kitae Kim)*34101124197
14Sugar Creek (Britt Flanigan)*3491225207
15Rivermoore Park (Julia Kempler)*2410816124
16The Manor (Tannaz Moderasi)*2451328197
17Bitsy Grant (Angela Fairfax)*2571430205
18Life Time (Kandis Anderson-Grant)*1561225176
19St Ives (Sarah Warford)*1551326188
20Bitsy Grant (Janice Wong)*1651633229
21Sugar Creek (Nneoma Elendu)*1651633242
22Chastain (Amy Azad)*0621633232

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Michelle Garcia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Michele Ramdeo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Audrey Bankhead
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.40
Tammy Leitch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.40
Lee Ann Harris
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.40
Stephanie Train
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.36
Maria Molinelli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.04
Jess Barre
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.02
Ingrid McGaughey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.99
Tracey Bankhead
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ellen White
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kristell Engram
published
Margaret Lane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sheri Taylor-Emery
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Ramdeo + Maria Molinelli2351% gamesnot enough data
Audrey Bankhead + Maria Molinelli213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Garcia
10W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%2%98%
2.79
Michele Ramdeo
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.58
3
Audrey Bankhead
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.43
Tammy Leitch
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.40
Lee Ann Harris
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
Stephanie Train
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
Maria Molinelli
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
Jess Barre
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Ingrid McGaughey
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Tracey Bankhead
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Ellen White
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristell Engram
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Margaret Lane
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sheri Taylor-Emery
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.