Teams

Flanagan - 18+ 6.5W

2022 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women 18 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-08-31vs Jones 18+ 6.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Wilson / Laura Loftin vs Frida Nordmark / Elia Mavronikolas3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-08-10vs Brodeur J. 18+ 6.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Wilson / Meghan Hilleboe vs Allison Steinmetz / Cheryl Ryding4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Layne Saunders
published
3.35
Reeves Rhoten
published
3.31
Britt Flanagan
published 3.5
3.30
Lauran Epstein
published
3.25
Rosa Phillips
published
3.10
Emily Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Jen Strasser
published
3.05
Meghan Hilleboe
published
3.04
Mary Winstead
published
2.96
Laura Loftin
published
2.85
Amy Kemp
published 3
2.78
Gail Terrell
published 3
Heather Hill
published 3
Melinda Billings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Winstead + Lauran Epstein033 matchesnot enough data
Emily Wilson + Lauran Epstein303 matchesnot enough data
Meghan Hilleboe + Laura Loftin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Layne Saunders
153W–75L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
Reeves Rhoten
30W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Britt Flanagan
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Lauran Epstein
14W–14L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Rosa Phillips
13W–15L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Emily Wilson
179W–124L career · 2 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Jen Strasser
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
Meghan Hilleboe
9W–15L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
Mary Winstead
16W–22L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
Laura Loftin
15W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Amy Kemp
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Gail Terrell
18W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Heather Hill
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melinda Billings
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.