Teams

Smith/Memphis

2025 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 8.5 18 & Over Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.12 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-09vs Silver/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Lewis / Hattie Rounder vs Margo Gruen / Jenny Branston6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKate Stakem / Brooke Parker Justice vs Lu Schneider / Lisa Silver7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlison Rice / Courtney Smith vs Vail Gates / Patricia Dewey6-2, 7-6
2025-09-07vs Mccalla/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllison Harris / Hattie Rounder vs Emily Brown / Lauren Feury5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Lewis / Ana Yambrek vs Dana Bray / Cameron Seay6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCourtney Smith / Jennifer Sammons vs Kristin Dannemiller / Shannon McCalla4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-08-24vs Echols/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesStephanie Sheahan / Isabel Xu vs Emily Gallops / Nelli Golmeeva4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAllison Harris / Kate Stakem vs Lynn Davis / Caitlin Bond6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Sexton / E'Lane Williams vs Bianca Clayton / Gloria Hicks5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-08-17vs Moore/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesHattie Rounder / Neely Leavell vs Meredith Haselwood / Carmen Lewis6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCourtney Smith / Alison Rice vs Kristi Rice / Meredith Flynn2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Sexton / Elizabeth Lewis vs Aimee Gregg / Sarah Hervey7-6, 6-4
2025-08-10vs Carter/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesSamantha Ransone / Neely Leavell vs Catie Carter / Mary Johnston Tayloe6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAllison Harris / Elizabeth Bennett vs ANITA ARBELAEZ / Virginia Burbank7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesIsabel Xu / Ana Yambrek vs Emily Koelsch / Whitney Hayes6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-08-03vs Dertien/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlison Rice / Neely Leavell vs Marie-Christine Blaizel / Vivian Gresham6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Lewis / Christina Edwards vs Debbie Walker-Hulette / Kate Gould6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJosie Hammons / E'Lane Williams vs Deborah Kershner / Heather Patterson2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Hattie Rounder
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.18
Neely Leavell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.97
Ana Yambrek
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.96
Alison Rice
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.94
Isabel Xu
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.88
Jennifer Sammons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Josie Hammons
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.85
Allison Harris
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Kate Stakem
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Christina Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Samantha Ransone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.66
Stephanie Sheahan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
E'Lane Williams
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.48
Brooke Parker Justice
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.45
Suzanne Sexton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Edwards + Stephanie Sheahan2546% games+2.1% vs expected
Suzanne Sexton + Isabel Xu12655% games+1.6% vs expected
Brooke Parker Justice + E'Lane Williams13559% games+1.3% vs expected
Isabel Xu + Ana Yambrek8166% games−1.2% vs expected
Isabel Xu + Jennifer Sammons4258% games−1.3% vs expected
Christina Edwards + Jennifer Sammons5255% games−3.5% vs expected
E'Lane Williams + Josie Hammons4452% games−7.2% vs expected
Hattie Rounder + Neely Leavell4162% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hattie Rounder
43W–15L career · 7 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
Neely Leavell
24W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Ana Yambrek
37W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Alison Rice
23W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Isabel Xu
51W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Jennifer Sammons
37W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.88
Josie Hammons
44W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Allison Harris
39W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.85
Kate Stakem
35W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Christina Edwards
18W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
Samantha Ransone
19W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
Stephanie Sheahan
19W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
E'Lane Williams
45W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Brooke Parker Justice
36W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
Suzanne Sexton
22W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.