Teams

Ivory Ridge-Brockbank/Allen

2022 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 4.0W

17 players · average NTRP 3.95 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-15vs Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/BrooksSplit 11
L#2 Female DoublesEmily Jarvie / Nicole Holland vs Faith Petersen / Lauren Hawley6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 Female DoublesHeather Allen / Nanette Brockbank vs AMy Huish / Cathy Mclevish6-3, 6-2
2022-12-08vs Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/HronekLost 03
L#1 Female DoublesJana Fairbanks / Lisa Bullington vs Rosa McGuire / Rachel Labrum3-6, 1-5
L#2 Female DoublesMindy Christofferson / Jamie Price vs Carly Reese / Melinda Romney2-6, 4-6
L#3 Female DoublesEmily Jarvie / Lori Taylor vs Amber Greenwood / Rachel Ray5-7, 2-3
2022-12-01vs Sports Mall-Johnson/ScharmanLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesNicole Holland / Emily Jarvie vs Joanna Heiden / Robyn Scharman5-7, 6-5, 1-0
L#2 Female DoublesJamie Price / Mindy Christofferson vs Pamela Roberts / Crystel Fox7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2022-11-17Won 10
W#3 Female DoublesSharlene Enloe / Trista Willardson vs Chandi Hurd / Emily Benton6-3, 7-6
2022-11-10vs Sunpro-Warren/CarterSplit 11
L#2 Female DoublesSharlene Enloe / Nanette Brockbank vs Shannon Shepherd / Tricia Sederberg4-6, 6-7
W#3 Female DoublesJana Fairbanks / Tammy Petersen vs Michelle Fowkes / Cheryl Harker6-2, 6-5
2022-11-03vs Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/BrooksSplit 11
L#1 Female SinglesEmily Jarvie vs Lauren Hawley0-6, 0-6
W#2 Female DoublesSharlene Enloe / Trista Willardson vs Sherree Greenhalgh / Renae Brooks6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Johnson/Scharman5014615127
2Sunpro-Blackhurst/Mayberry5116818156
3RISE AC-Glines/Glines4215922190
4Ivory Ridge-Monson/Black42131124177
5Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek32101021149
6Cottonwood Club-Warren/Briesacher33141024163
7Sunpro-Warren/Carter33141025196
8Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks24131127193
9Ivory Ridge-Brockbank/Allen2491532242
10Liberty Park Tennis-Young/Swensen2481634233
11Sports Mall-Romney/Adamson1561837226
12Sunpro-Daniels/Wilson1551939241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Lisa Bullington
published
3.79
Angela Bleak
published 4
3.75
Sharlene Enloe
usually #2 Female Doubles 67%, also #3 Female Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Nicole Holland
published
3.72
Lori Murdock
published
3.70
Nanette Brockbank
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #3 Female Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Leah Lambert
published
3.65
Trista Willardson
published
3.59
Emily Jarvie
usually #1 Female Singles 25%, also #1 Female Doubles 25% · published 4
3.58
Jana Fairbanks
usually #3 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Mindy Christofferson
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Tammy Petersen
published
3.39
3.39
Jamie Price
published 4
3.38
Lori Taylor
published
3.34
Heather Allen
published 4
3.25
Heather Jensen
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Jensen + Mindy Christofferson5453% games+9.5% vs expected
Lisa Bullington + Mindy Christofferson5070% games+9.3% vs expected
Jamie Price + Lisa Bullington10459% games+7.3% vs expected
Jana Fairbanks + Lisa Bullington5459% games+6.0% vs expected
Nicole Holland + Emily Jarvie241156% games+4.5% vs expected
Angela Bleak + Heather Jensen61245% games+3.6% vs expected
Lisa Bullington + Lori Murdock551760% games+3.4% vs expected
Trista Willardson + Nanette Brockbank5355% games+2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Bullington
114W–43L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Angela Bleak
214W–163L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Sharlene Enloe
120W–104L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Nicole Holland
54W–34L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
Lori Murdock
72W–24L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Nanette Brockbank
79W–91L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.70
Leah Lambert
45W–59L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
Trista Willardson
67W–43L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Emily Jarvie
51W–68L career · 4 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Jana Fairbanks
48W–52L career · 2 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Mindy Christofferson
68W–76L career · 2 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
Tammy Petersen
40W–55L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.44
4
Christine Neeleman
28W–44L career · no lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
3.39
4
Jamie Price
45W–55L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
3.39
Lori Taylor
38W–57L career · no lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
3.38
4
Heather Allen
64W–75L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.34
3.5
Heather Jensen
44W–103L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.