Teams

Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks

2022 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 4.0W

17 players · average NTRP 3.85 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-15vs Ivory Ridge-Brockbank/AllenWon 30
W#1 Female DoublesMelanie Vickroy / Tessa Weise vs Heather Jensen / Leah Lambert6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 Female SinglesMarcela Pomadoro vs Angela Bleak6-1, 7-6
W#2 Female DoublesFaith Petersen / Lauren Hawley vs Emily Jarvie / Nicole Holland3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-12-08vs Sunpro-Warren/CarterWon 20
W#1 Female SinglesFaith Petersen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 Female DoublesSherree Greenhalgh / Jill Brown vs Janice Stokes-Burns / Cheryl Harker7-5, 4-2
2022-12-01vs Liberty Park Tennis-Young/SwensenSplit 11
L#1 Female SinglesFaith Petersen vs Amy Earl2-6, 2-3
W#3 Female DoublesCathy Mclevish / Megan Rusconi vs Gretel Sampson / Dalynn Thomas6-3, 6-5
2022-11-17vs Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/HronekLost 02
L#1 Female SinglesMarcela Pomadoro vs Jessica Schulz4-6, 0-4
L#3 Female DoublesRenae Brooks / Jutien Page vs Rosa McGuire / Nicole Mills3-6, 4-5
2022-11-10vs Sports Mall-Johnson/ScharmanLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesJill Brown / Megan Rusconi vs Kristi Warren / Stacie Johnson0-6, 5-7
2022-11-03vs Ivory Ridge-Brockbank/AllenLost 02
L#2 Female DoublesSherree Greenhalgh / Renae Brooks vs Sharlene Enloe / Trista Willardson4-6, 3-6
L#3 Female DoublesTessa Weise / Melanie Vickroy vs Heather Jensen / Leah Lambert4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Johnson/Scharman5014615127
2Sunpro-Blackhurst/Mayberry5116818156
3RISE AC-Glines/Glines4215922190
4Ivory Ridge-Monson/Black42131124177
5Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek32101021149
6Cottonwood Club-Warren/Briesacher33141024163
7Sunpro-Warren/Carter33141025196
8Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks24131127193
9Ivory Ridge-Brockbank/Allen2491532242
10Liberty Park Tennis-Young/Swensen2481634233
11Sports Mall-Romney/Adamson1561837226
12Sunpro-Daniels/Wilson1551939241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Lauren Hawley
published
3.94
Marcela Pomadoro
usually #1 Female Singles 100% · published 4
3.92
Kristin Killian
usually #1 Female Doubles 60%, also #2 Female Doubles 40% · published 4
3.88
Faith Petersen
usually #1 Female Singles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Jutien Page
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Laura Nunnelly
usually #2 Female Doubles 33%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 4
3.56
AMy Huish
published 4
3.56
Carol Molesky
published 4
3.44
Renae Brooks
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #3 Female Doubles 50% · published 4
3.36
Wendy Engel
published
3.36
Sherree Greenhalgh
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.25
Cathy Mclevish
published 3.5
3.23
Tessa Weise
usually #3 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Megan Rusconi
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #3 Female Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Elaine Zuckerman
published 3.5
Jennifer Peay
published
Melanie Vickroy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Mclevish + Carol Molesky5455% games+3.5% vs expected
AMy Huish + Jutien Page18855% games+2.9% vs expected
AMy Huish + Kristin Killian201259% games+2.7% vs expected
Megan Rusconi + Renae Brooks191847% games+2.6% vs expected
Cathy Mclevish + Megan Rusconi0941% games−0.5% vs expected
Sherree Greenhalgh + Renae Brooks345245% games−1.6% vs expected
Sherree Greenhalgh + Cathy Mclevish91642% games−2.4% vs expected
Sherree Greenhalgh + Megan Rusconi2445% games−5.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Hawley
122W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
4.48
4
Marcela Pomadoro
135W–82L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Kristin Killian
105W–49L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Faith Petersen
101W–83L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Jutien Page
86W–97L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Laura Nunnelly
47W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
AMy Huish
83W–62L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Carol Molesky
21W–26L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Renae Brooks
96W–131L career · 2 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.44
Wendy Engel
60W–33L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
4
Sherree Greenhalgh
90W–159L career · 2 lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
3.36
3.5
Cathy Mclevish
41W–84L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Tessa Weise
42W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Megan Rusconi
73W–128L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Elaine Zuckerman
16W–55L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Jennifer Peay
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melanie Vickroy
31W–77L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.