Teams

Racketeers

2023 USTA MIXED 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

12 players · average NTRP 4.30 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-04-08vs PTSA 9.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJeff Buckingham / Rilee Moorhead vs Chad Vaughn / Becky Caven3-6, 2-6
2023-04-01Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJeff Buckingham / Rachel Moorhead vs Theresa Haskell / Ryan Stewart4-6, 6-7
2023-03-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesJeff Buckingham / Rilee Moorhead vs Spencer Woods / Clarissa Cutler-Evans6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.87
Dan Buckingham
published 5
Megan Lalone
published 5
4.50
Rilee Moorhead
published 4.5
4.45
Kathy Brashear
published 4.5
4.36
Rachel Moorhead
published 4.5
4.03
Mike Buckingham
published 4
Bill Sharp
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.70
Dawna Buckingham
published 4
3.65
Maryann Moorhead
published 4
3.38
Russell Moorhead
published 3.5
Gina Sharp
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jeff Buckingham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Buckingham + Maryann Moorhead6648% games+9.1% vs expected
Rilee Moorhead + Dan Buckingham8360% games+5.6% vs expected
Dawna Buckingham + Dan Buckingham15955% games+2.1% vs expected
Maryann Moorhead + Dan Buckingham21656% games+0.1% vs expected
Russell Moorhead + Rilee Moorhead2747% games−2.0% vs expected
Russell Moorhead + Rachel Moorhead81050% games−2.7% vs expected
Maryann Moorhead + Russell Moorhead14952% games−4.4% vs expected
Rilee Moorhead + Jeff Buckingham181452% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Dan Buckingham
127W–54L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.87
5
Megan Lalone
13W–5L career · type M · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Rilee Moorhead
72W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
4.50
4.5
Kathy Brashear
172W–68L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
4.45
4.5
Rachel Moorhead
49W–35L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
4.36
4
Mike Buckingham
120W–80L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
4.03
4
Bill Sharp
18W–28L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Dawna Buckingham
94W–65L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Maryann Moorhead
148W–106L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Russell Moorhead
109W–102L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%79%20%
3.38
Gina Sharp
37W–14L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeff Buckingham
28W–30L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.