Teams

SGV Queens of the Court-Yu-Arroyo Seco/SU4

2023 Adult Division - 40& Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.59 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Diana Rochford
published 4
3.72
Deborah Babineau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Rumduol Vuong
published 4
3.62
Darlene Scott
published 4
3.57
Cristina Padron
published 3.5
3.29
Mindy Schiffman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Aparna Bhargava
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
3.19
Danette Stein
published 3.5
3.15
Makiko Sato
published
3.15
Sanja Morris
published
2.96
DARCELIA WILSON
published 3
2.92
Andrea Fruits
published 3
2.91
Rima Zobayan
published
2.87
Felicia Yu
published 3.5
2.74
Susan Biales
published
2.74
Sharon Spangler
published
Juliet Amenta
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rima Zobayan + Susan Biales4257% games+7.0% vs expected
Rumduol Vuong + Deborah Babineau131648% games+4.3% vs expected
Sharon Spangler + Andrea Fruits224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Rochford
22W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Deborah Babineau
108W–119L career · 1 line in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Rumduol Vuong
57W–56L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Darlene Scott
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Cristina Padron
12W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.57
3.5
Mindy Schiffman
84W–100L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Aparna Bhargava
66W–94L career · 1 line in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Janna Conner-Niclaes
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Danette Stein
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.19
Makiko Sato
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
Sanja Morris
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.15
3
DARCELIA WILSON
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Andrea Fruits
15W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
Rima Zobayan
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
2.91
3.5
Felicia Yu
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
2.87
Susan Biales
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
Sharon Spangler
8W–16L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
Juliet Amenta
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.