Teams

Aikens 3.5W 40s Tues PM

2024 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 40 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Lynette Paley
published
3.35
Margaret Reynolds
published
3.29
Cindy Cooke
published 3
3.24
Kathy Chinnis
published
3.24
Pamela Aikens
published
3.19
Betsey Wells
published 3.5
3.16
Sue Ann Lapp
published
2.99
Elia Mavronikolas
published
2.90
Carol Poling
published 3.5
2.61
Renuka Shivaji
published
2.47
Rose Chrismon
published
Karen Brady-Siler
published
Susan Abels
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Aikens + Carol Poling4251% gamesnot enough data
Rose Chrismon + Kathy Chinnis033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynette Paley
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Margaret Reynolds
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3
Cindy Cooke
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.29
Kathy Chinnis
17W–33L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Pamela Aikens
19W–36L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Betsey Wells
14W–21L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Sue Ann Lapp
19W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
3.16
Elia Mavronikolas
27W–40L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.99
3.5
Carol Poling
14W–18L career · no lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
2.90
Renuka Shivaji
8W–18L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
2.61
Rose Chrismon
3W–26L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.47
Karen Brady-Siler
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Abels
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.