Teams

Racketeers

2023 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 4.19 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-05vs PTSA 8.5Lost 02
L#2 DoublesGina Sharp / Bill Sharp vs Becky Caven / Alex Wong3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMike Buckingham / Michelle Phillips vs Robert Miranda / Madelyn Reid0-6, 2-6
2023-08-29vs Pocket AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesBill Sharp / Gina Sharp vs Anya Sandusky / Landon Reese4-6, 3-6
2023-08-22vs Strung Out 8.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesGina Sharp / Bill Sharp vs Dana Gross / Soo Kang6-1, 6-0
2023-08-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Phillips / Mike Buckingham vs Wallace Eastwood / Christine Reeds6-3, 6-0
2023-08-13vs Pocket AcesSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBill Sharp / Gina Sharp vs Jeanna Rice / Brian Rice7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMike Buckingham / Michelle Phillips vs Matt Rezendes / Anya Sandusky6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-08-09vs Get Your Shot TogetherLost 01
L#2 DoublesBill Sharp / Gina Sharp vs Rachel Kincheloe / Karl Baughman3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PTSA 8.57323718221
2Get Your Shot Together73161429262
3ETC Backhanded Compliments55131736283
4Strung Out 8.537111943306
5Racketeers1982245280

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Rilee Moorhead
published 4.5
4.47
Lauren Drew
published 4.5
4.37
Rachel Moorhead
published 4.5
Gina Sharp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Nick Wilson
published 4.5
4.21
Mike Kirby
published 4.5
4.11
Mike Buckingham
published 4
3.95
Brian Johnson
published 4
3.84
Diana Gastanaga
published 4
Bill Sharp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Maryann Moorhead
published 4
3.37
Russell Moorhead
published 3.5
3.28
Holly Johnson
published 4
Michelle Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Buckingham + Maryann Moorhead81047% games+7.4% vs expected
Russell Moorhead + Rilee Moorhead2747% games+1.2% vs expected
Diana Gastanaga + Mike Kirby151049% games−2.4% vs expected
Maryann Moorhead + Nick Wilson2642% games−2.9% vs expected
Maryann Moorhead + Russell Moorhead14952% games−2.9% vs expected
Russell Moorhead + Rachel Moorhead81050% games−3.2% vs expected
Mike Buckingham + Rilee Moorhead5945% games−3.7% vs expected
Gina Sharp + Bill Sharp111547% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Rilee Moorhead
74W–34L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
4.53
4.5
Lauren Drew
65W–33L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
4.47
4.5
Rachel Moorhead
49W–37L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
4.37
4.5
Gina Sharp
79W–63L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Nick Wilson
42W–34L career · type M · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Mike Kirby
241W–106L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
4.21
4
Mike Buckingham
137W–88L career · no lines in 2023
<1%20%80%
4.11
4
Brian Johnson
207W–115L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Diana Gastanaga
121W–79L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Bill Sharp
53W–62L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Maryann Moorhead
149W–107L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Russell Moorhead
110W–102L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
4
Holly Johnson
65W–65L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.28
Michelle Phillips
42W–40L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.