Teams

East 18 Tri 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM

2025 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-22vs Dulin 18+ Tri 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PMLost 01
L#1 DoublesBlythe Murphy / Rebekah East vs Susan Parsons / Tracy Harlan1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesCameron Wannamaker / Amy Geer vs Rhyssa Earley / Virginia Easley0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Schott / Thais Warwar vs Bobbie Westrick / Ariane Cox2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-06-24vs Goy 18+ Tri 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PMSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRebekah East / Sarah Schott vs Kimberly Franz / Chetana Honnarayanahalli0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMelanie Burns / Aphton Lang vs Jordan Allison / Katie Bir6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBlythe Murphy / Rebekah East vs Karen Lubeck Smith / Andrea Pollina6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBlythe Murphy / Cameron Wannamaker vs Ashley Jones / Andrea Sweat0-6, 2-6
2025-06-06vs Williamson 18+ Tri 4.0/3.5/3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Geer / Cameron Wannamaker vs Kristin Williamson / Jennifer Tewksbury0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRebekah East / Sarah Schott vs Karrah Durham / Samantha Price4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMelanie Burns / Sloane McPeak vs Sara Adamson / Cheryl Rankin6-1, 6-1
2025-06-03vs Howell 18+ Tri 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PMSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSarah Schott / Sloane McPeak vs Clarissa Tatum / Meghan de Young3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCourtney Dagger / Aphton Lang vs Allison Aldridge / Alexa Smith7-6, 6-3
2025-05-20vs Baker 18+ Tri 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PMLost 01
L#2 DoublesBlythe Murphy / Rebekah East vs Ashley Xu / Cheryl Scott2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Cameron Wannamaker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Blythe Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Jessica Huellmantel
published
3.31
Thais Warwar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Aphton Lang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Heidi Boswell
published
3.15
Sloane McPeak
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Sarah Schott
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.03
Amy Geer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Rebekah East
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Courtney Dagger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.95
Melanie Burns
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Dagger + Amy Geer224 matchesnot enough data
Blythe Murphy + Thais Warwar314 matchesnot enough data
Rebekah East + Sarah Schott044 matchesnot enough data
Rebekah East + Sloane McPeak404 matchesnot enough data
Aphton Lang + Heidi Boswell314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cameron Wannamaker
26W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Blythe Murphy
127W–108L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Jessica Huellmantel
13W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Thais Warwar
29W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Aphton Lang
23W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Heidi Boswell
25W–13L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Sloane McPeak
32W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
Sarah Schott
3W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Amy Geer
9W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Rebekah East
26W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Courtney Dagger
37W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
Melanie Burns
27W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.